» Articles » PMID: 34326853

Modeling of Individual Fruit-Bearing Capacity of Trees Is Aimed at Optimizing Fruit Quality of X Borkh. 'Gala'

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2021 Jul 30
PMID 34326853
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The capacity of apple trees to produce fruit of a desired diameter, i.e., fruit-bearing capacity (FBC), was investigated by considering the inter-tree variability of leaf area (LA). The LA of 996 trees in a commercial apple orchard was measured by using a terrestrial two-dimensional (2D) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) laser scanner for two consecutive years. The FBC of the trees was simulated in a carbon balance model by utilizing the LiDAR-scanned total LA of the trees, seasonal records of fruit and leaf gas exchanges, fruit growth rates, and weather data. The FBC was compared to the actual fruit size measured in a sorting line on each individual tree. The variance of FBC was similar in both years, whereas each individual tree showed different FBC in both seasons as indicated in the spatially resolved data of FBC. Considering a target mean fruit diameter of 65 mm, FBC ranged from 84 to 168 fruit per tree in 2018 and from 55 to 179 fruit per tree in 2019 depending on the total LA of the trees. The simulated FBC to produce the mean harvest fruit diameter of 65 mm and the actual number of the harvested fruit >65 mm per tree were in good agreement. Fruit quality, indicated by fruit's size and soluble solids content (SSC), showed enhanced percentages of the desired fruit quality according to the seasonally total absorbed photosynthetic energy (TAPE) of the tree per fruit. To achieve a target fruit diameter and reduce the variance in SSC at harvest, the FBC should be considered in crop load management practices. However, achieving this purpose requires annual spatial monitoring of the individual FBC of trees.

References
1.
Bairam E, leMorvan C, Delaire M, Buck-Sorlin G . Fruit and Leaf Response to Different Source-Sink Ratios in Apple, at the Scale of the Fruit-Bearing Branch. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10:1039. PMC: 6722240. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01039. View

2.
Apolo-Apolo O, Perez-Ruiz M, Martinez-Guanter J, Valente J . A Cloud-Based Environment for Generating Yield Estimation Maps From Apple Orchards Using UAV Imagery and a Deep Learning Technique. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:1086. PMC: 7378326. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01086. View

3.
Palmer J, Giuliani R, Adams H . Effect of crop load on fruiting and leaf photosynthesis of 'Braeburn'/M.26 apple trees. Tree Physiol. 2004; 17(11):741-6. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/17.11.741. View

4.
Coupel-Ledru A, Pallas B, Delalande M, Boudon F, Carrie E, Martinez S . Multi-scale high-throughput phenotyping of apple architectural and functional traits in orchard reveals genotypic variability under contrasted watering regimes. Hortic Res. 2019; 6:52. PMC: 6491481. DOI: 10.1038/s41438-019-0137-3. View

5.
Feng F, Li M, Ma F, Cheng L . Effects of location within the tree canopy on carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids and phenolic compounds in the fruit peel and flesh from three apple (Malus × domestica) cultivars. Hortic Res. 2015; 1:14019. PMC: 4596324. DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2014.19. View