» Articles » PMID: 34310524

Bridging the Gap Between Pilot and Scale-Up: A Model of Antenatal Testing for Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections From Botswana

Overview
Journal Sex Transm Dis
Date 2021 Jul 26
PMID 34310524
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) associated with adverse outcomes, yet most countries do not test and conduct syndromic management, which lacks sensitivity and specificity. Innovations allow for expanded STI testing; however, cost is a barrier.

Methods: Using inputs from a pilot program in Botswana, we developed a model among a hypothetical population of 50,000 pregnant women to compare 1-year costs and outcomes associated with 3 antenatal STI testing strategies: (1) point-of-care, (2) centralized laboratory, and (3) a mixed approach (point of care at high-volume sites, and hubs elsewhere), and syndromic management.

Results: Syndromic management had the lowest delivery cost but was associated with the most infections at delivery, uninfected women treated, CT/NG-related low-birth-weight infants, disability-adjusted life years, and low birth weight hospitalization costs. Point-of-care CT/NG testing would treat and cure the most infections but had the highest delivery cost. Among the testing scenarios, the mixed scenario had the most favorable cost per woman treated and cured ($534/cure). Compared with syndromic management, the mixed approach resulted in a mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $953 per disability-adjusted life years averted, which is cost-effective under World Health Organization's one-time per-capita gross domestic product willingness-to-pay threshold.

Conclusions: As countries consider new technologies to strengthen health services, there is an opportunity to determine how to best deploy resources. Compared with point-of-care, centralized laboratory, and syndromic management, the mixed approach offered the lowest cost per infection averted and is cost-effective if policy makers' willingness to pay is informed by the World Health Organization's gross domestic product/capita threshold.

Citing Articles

HIV Prevention Tools Across the Pregnancy Continuum: What Works, What Does Not, and What Can We Do Differently?.

Mugambi M, Pintye J, Heffron R, Barnabas R, John-Stewart G Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022; 19(5):293-300.

PMID: 35984551 PMC: 9717592. DOI: 10.1007/s11904-022-00621-1.

References
1.
Romoren M, Sundby J, Velauthapillai M, Rahman M, Klouman E, Hjortdahl P . Chlamydia and gonorrhoea in pregnant Batswana women: time to discard the syndromic approach?. BMC Infect Dis. 2007; 7:27. PMC: 1955709. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-27. View

2.
Moodley D, Moodley P, Sebitloane M, Soowamber D, McNaughton-Reyes H, Groves A . High prevalence and incidence of asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections during pregnancy and postdelivery in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. Sex Transm Dis. 2014; 42(1):43-7. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000219. View

3.
Workowski K . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. Clin Infect Dis. 2015; 61 Suppl 8:S759-62. DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ771. View

4.
Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J . Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet. 2016; 388(10063):3027-3035. PMC: 5161777. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8. View

5.
RYAN Jr G, Abdella T, McNeeley S, Baselski V, Drummond D . Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy and effect of treatment on outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 162(1):34-9. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90815-o. View