» Articles » PMID: 34306106

Alteration of Fatty Acid Profile of Milk in Holstein Cows Fed As Probiotic: a Field Study

Overview
Journal Iran J Vet Res
Date 2021 Jul 26
PMID 34306106
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Probiotics may improve milk quality and the general health status of animals.

Aims: The effects of dietary PRM101 on milk components, milk fatty acids (FA), and some health indicators of dairy cows were investigated.

Methods: The probiotic was added to the feed of 12 Holstein cows (2 g/cow: 2 × 10 CFU/cow) for 63 days compared to a control group fed on the basal ration (n=11). Milk and blood samples were taken on days 0, 21, 42, and 63.

Results: The yields of milk and energy corrected milk (ECM; computed from milk weight and its fat and protein content) decreased linearly and similarly (P=0.60) in both groups. The treatment cows, however, showed quadratic increases in the weights of milk (P=0.03) and ECM (P=0.04) at d42 of the study. Energy corrected milk (d42, P<0.05) and crude protein content of milk (d42, P<0.05; d63, P<0.1) were higher in the cows receiving the probiotic. The proportions of heptadecanoic (C17:0; P=0.002) and linoleic (C18:2; P=0.077) acids in milk fat (g/100 g fat) were higher in the treatment cows on d63. Milk total antioxidant capacity (TAC), malondialdehyde (MDA), and similarly, amyloid A (AA) and haptoglobin (Hp) of milk and blood were not affected. Total antioxidant capacity and MDA were negatively correlated in the control group (r=-0.669, P=0.005). Heptadecanoic acid correlated negatively with milk MDA (r=-0.611, P=0.035) and positively (r=0.591, P=0.043) with serum Hp in the treatment cows.

Conclusion: Dietary PRM101 may improve the proportions of C17:0 and C18:2 FA in milk. Some improvements in milk protein and the health status of the cows may also be anticipated.

Citing Articles

Probiotic Feed Additive: Modulation of Sow Milk Metabolomics and Mitigation of Pre-Weaning Piglet Diarrhea.

Ruampatana J, Suwimonteerabutr J, Homyog K, Mekboonsonglarp W, Kanjanavaikoon K, der Veken W Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(14).

PMID: 39061560 PMC: 11273528. DOI: 10.3390/ani14142098.

References
1.
Warensjo E, Smedman A, Stegmayr B, Hallmans G, Weinehall L, Vessby B . Stroke and plasma markers of milk fat intake--a prospective nested case-control study. Nutr J. 2009; 8:21. PMC: 2689251. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-21. View

2.
Scaife J, Wahle K, GARTON G . Utilization of methylmalonate for the synthesis of branched-chain fatty acids by preparations of chicken liver and sheep adipose tissue. Biochem J. 1978; 176(3):799-804. PMC: 1186303. DOI: 10.1042/bj1760799. View

3.
Sun P, Wang J, Deng L . Effects of Bacillus subtilis natto on milk production, rumen fermentation and ruminal microbiome of dairy cows. Animal. 2012; 7(2):216-22. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731112001188. View

4.
Smedman A, Gustafsson I, Berglund L, Vessby B . Pentadecanoic acid in serum as a marker for intake of milk fat: relations between intake of milk fat and metabolic risk factors. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 69(1):22-9. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/69.1.22. View

5.
Castro-Webb N, Ruiz-Narvaez E, Campos H . Cross-sectional study of conjugated linoleic acid in adipose tissue and risk of diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 96(1):175-81. PMC: 3374738. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.011858. View