» Articles » PMID: 34301003

Simple Preparation of Polydimethylsiloxane and Polyurethane Blend Film for Marine Antibiofouling Application

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jul 24
PMID 34301003
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A key way to prevent undesirable fouling of any structure in the marine environment, without harming any microorganisms, is to use a polymer film with high hydrophobicity. The polymer film, which was simply prepared from a blend of hydrophobic polydimethylsiloxane elastomer and hydrophilic polyurethane, showed improved properties and economic viability for antifouling film for the marine industry. The field emission scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (FESEM and EDX) results from the polymer blend suggested a homogenous morphology and good distribution of the polyurethane disperse phase. The PDMS:PU blend (95:5) film gave a water contact angle of 103.4° ± 3.8° and the PDMS film gave a water contact angle of 109.5° ± 4.2°. Moreover, the PDMS:PU blend (95:5) film could also be modified with surface patterning by using soft lithography process to further increase the hydrophobicity. It was found that PDMS:PU blend (95:5) film with micro patterning from soft lithography process increased the contact angle to 128.8° ± 1.6°. The results from a field test in the Gulf of Thailand illustrated that the bonding strength between the barnacles and the PDMS:PU blend (95:5) film (0.07 MPa) were lower than the bonding strength between the barnacles and the carbon steel (1.16 MPa). The barnacles on the PDMS:PU blend (95:5) film were more easily removed from the surface. This indicated that the PDMS:PU blend (95:5) exhibited excellent antifouling properties and the results indicated that the PDMS:PU blend (95:5) film with micro patterning surface could be employed for antifouling application.

Citing Articles

Thermodynamic Parameters of Crosslinked Elastomers (BR, SBR and NBR) and Their Blends.

Leyva-Porras C, Estrada-Moreno I, Pinon-Balderrama C, Flores-Gallardo S, Marquez-Lucero A Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(3).

PMID: 38337240 PMC: 10856988. DOI: 10.3390/polym16030351.


Developing an Effective and Durable Film for Marine Fouling Prevention from PDMS/SiO and PDMS/PU with SiO Composites.

Chungprempree J, Preechawong J, Nithitanakul M Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(20).

PMID: 36297830 PMC: 9611852. DOI: 10.3390/polym14204252.


Study on the Physical, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of SEBS/PP (Styrene-Ethylene-Butylene-Styrene/Polypropylene) Blend as a Medical Fluid Bag.

Sundera Murthe S, Sreekantan S, S M N Mydin R Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(16).

PMID: 36015524 PMC: 9416621. DOI: 10.3390/polym14163267.

References
1.
Ouyang L, Kuo C, Farrell B, Pathak S, Wei B, Qu J . Poly[3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene (EDOT) -co- 1,3,5-tri[2-(3,4-ethylene dioxythienyl)]-benzene (EPh)] copolymers (PEDOT-co-EPh): optical, electrochemical and mechanical properties. J Mater Chem B. 2015; 3(25):5010-5020. PMC: 4582677. DOI: 10.1039/C5TB00053J. View

2.
Weibel D, DiLuzio W, Whitesides G . Microfabrication meets microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007; 5(3):209-18. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1616. View

3.
Sokolova A, Cilz N, Daniels J, Stafslien S, Brewer L, Wendt D . A comparison of the antifouling/foul-release characteristics of non-biocidal xerogel and commercial coatings toward micro- and macrofouling organisms. Biofouling. 2012; 28(5):511-23. DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2012.690197. View

4.
Wu Z, Wang H, Tian X, Cui P, Ding X, Ye X . The effects of polydimethylsiloxane on transparent and hydrophobic waterborne polyurethane coatings containing polydimethylsiloxane. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014; 16(14):6787-94. DOI: 10.1039/c3cp54429j. View

5.
Gomes T, Pereira C, Cardoso C, Pinheiro J, Cancio I, Bebianno M . Accumulation and toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in the digestive gland of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Aquat Toxicol. 2012; 118-119:72-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.03.017. View