» Articles » PMID: 34299700

Designing an EHealth Well-Being Program: A Participatory Design Approach

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jul 24
PMID 34299700
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, the relevance of eHealth interventions has become increasingly evident. However, a sequential procedural application to cocreating eHealth interventions is currently lacking. This paper demonstrates the implementation of a participatory design (PD) process to inform the design of an eHealth intervention aiming to enhance well-being. PD sessions were conducted with 57 people across four sessions. Within PD sessions participants experienced prototype activities, provided feedback and designed program interventions. A 5-week eHealth well-being intervention focusing on lifestyle, habits, physical activity, and meditation was proposed. The program is suggested to be delivered through online workshops and online community interaction. A five-step PD process emerged; namely, (1) collecting best practices, (2) participatory discovery, (3) initial proof-of-concept, (4) participatory prototyping, and (5) pilot intervention proof-of-concept finalisation. Health professionals, behaviour change practitioners and program planners can adopt this process to ensure end-user cocreation using the five-step process. The five-step PD process may help to create user-friendly programs.

Citing Articles

Identifying app components that promote physical activity: a group concept mapping study.

Braun M, Carlier S, De Backere F, Van De Velde M, De Turck F, Crombez G PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17100.

PMID: 38563015 PMC: 10984184. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17100.


Improving Well-Being in Young Adults: A Social Marketing Proof-of-Concept.

van Hierden Y, Rundle-Thiele S, Dietrich T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(9).

PMID: 35564645 PMC: 9103647. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095248.

References
1.
Andajani-Sutjahjo S, Liew T, Smith J, Esekielu I, Mason G, Tariu I . Engaging community volunteers in participatory action research in Tāmaki community of Auckland, New Zealand. Health Promot Int. 2016; 33(2):219-228. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daw057. View

2.
Fernandez M, Ruiter R, Markham C, Kok G . Intervention Mapping: Theory- and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples. Front Public Health. 2019; 7:209. PMC: 6702459. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00209. View

3.
Thorsen A, Lassen A, Tetens I, Hels O, Mikkelsen B . Long-term sustainability of a worksite canteen intervention of serving more fruit and vegetables. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13(10):1647-52. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010001242. View

4.
Waterman A, Schwartz S, Zamboanga B, Ravert R, Williams M, Agocha V . The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. J Posit Psychol. 2021; 5(1):41-61. PMC: 8317967. DOI: 10.1080/17439760903435208. View

5.
Kozasa E, Balardin J, Sato J, Chaim K, Lacerda S, Radvany J . Effects of a 7-Day Meditation Retreat on the Brain Function of Meditators and Non-Meditators During an Attention Task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12:222. PMC: 6004402. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00222. View