» Articles » PMID: 34298781

PET/MRI for Staging the Axilla in Breast Cancer: Current Evidence and the Rationale for SNB Vs. PET/MRI Trials

Abstract

Axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) is no longer a therapeutic procedure but has become a purely staging procedure. The progressive improvement in imaging techniques has paved the way to the hypothesis that prognostic information on nodal status deriving from surgery could be obtained with an accurate diagnostic exam. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a relatively new imaging tool and its role in breast cancer patients is still under investigation. We reviewed the available literature on PET/MRI in BC patients. This overview showed that PET/MRI yields a high diagnostic performance for the primary tumor and distant lesions of liver, brain and bone. In particular, the results of PET/MRI in staging the axilla are promising. This provided the rationale for two prospective comparative trials between axillary surgery and PET/MRI that could lead to a further de-escalation of surgical treatment of BC. • SNB vs. PET/MRI 1 trial compares PET/MRI and axillary surgery in staging the axilla of BC patients undergoing primary systemic therapy (PST). • SNB vs. PET/MRI 2 trial compares PET/MRI and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in staging the axilla of early BC patients who are candidates for upfront surgery. Finally, these ongoing studies will help clarify the role of PET/MRI in BC and establish whether it represents a useful diagnostic tool that could guide, or ideally replace, axillary surgery in the future.

Citing Articles

Baseline [F]FDG PET/CT and MRI first-order breast tumor features do not improve pathological complete response prediction to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Oliveira C, Oliveira F, Constantino C, Alves C, Brito M, Cardoso F Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(12):3709-3718.

PMID: 38922396 PMC: 11445295. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06815-6.


PET/MRI and Novel Targets for Breast Cancer.

Chung H, Park K, Lim I, Noh W, Yoo Y, Nam S Biomedicines. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38255277 PMC: 10813582. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010172.


Prospective validation of 18F-Fluoroethylcholine as a tracer in PET/MRI for the evaluation of breast lesions and prediction of lymph node status.

Clauser P, Rasul S, Kapetas P, Fueger B, Milos R, Balber T Radiol Med. 2023; 128(6):689-698.

PMID: 37221356 PMC: 10264497. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01633-6.


Bone Metastases Detection in Patients with Breast Cancer: Does Bone Scintigraphy Add Information to PET/CT?.

Santos J, Abreu M, Santos M, Duarte H, Alpoim T, Prospero I Oncologist. 2023; 28(8):e600-e605.

PMID: 37029988 PMC: 10400135. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad087.


Overview of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Medical Imaging.

Zheng D, He X, Jing J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36675348 PMC: 9864608. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020419.


References
1.
Sawicki L, Grueneisen J, Schaarschmidt B, Buchbender C, Nagarajah J, Umutlu L . Evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85(2):459-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.010. View

2.
Raad R, Friedman K, Heacock L, Ponzo F, Melsaether A, Chandarana H . Outcome of small lung nodules missed on hybrid PET/MRI in patients with primary malignancy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 43(2):504-11. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25005. View

3.
Grueneisen J, Sawicki L, Wetter A, Kirchner J, Kinner S, Aktas B . Evaluation of PET and MR datasets in integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI: A comparison of different MR sequences for whole-body restaging of breast cancer patients. Eur J Radiol. 2017; 89:14-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.12.019. View

4.
Ratib O, Beyer T . Whole-body hybrid PET/MRI: ready for clinical use?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011; 38(6):992-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-1790-4. View

5.
Dihge L, Grabau D, Rasmussen R, Bendahl P, Ryden L . The accuracy of preoperative axillary nodal staging in primary breast cancer by ultrasound is modified by nodal metastatic load and tumor biology. Acta Oncol. 2016; 55(8):976-82. PMC: 4950423. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2016.1146826. View