» Articles » PMID: 34298725

Early Imaging and Molecular Changes with Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab in Stage II/III Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Jul 24
PMID 34298725
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective, phase II study evaluated novel biomarkers as predictors of response to bevacizumab in patients with breast cancer (BC), using serial imaging methods and gene expression analysis. Patients with primary stage II/III BC received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (cycle 1; C1), then four cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel doxorubicin, and bevacizumab every 3 weeks (C2-C5). Tumour proliferation and hypoxic status were evaluated using F-fluoro-3'-deoxy-3'-L-fluorothymidine (FLT)- and F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO)-positron emission tomography (PET) at baseline, and during C1 and C5. Pre- and post-bevacizumab vascular changes were evaluated using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Molecular biomarkers were assessed using microarray analysis. A total of 70 patients were assessed for treatment efficacy. Significant decreases from baseline in tumour proliferation (FLT-PET), vascularity, and perfusion (DCE-MRI) were observed during C1 ( ≤ 0.001), independent of tumour subtype. Bevacizumab treatment did not affect hypoxic tumour status (FMISO-PET). Significant changes in the expression of 28 genes were observed after C1. Changes in vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2p levels were observed in 65 patients, with a > 20% decrease in VEGFR-2p observed in 13/65. Serial imaging techniques and molecular gene profiling identified several potentially predictive biomarkers that may predict response to neoadjuvant bevacizumab therapy in BC patients.

Citing Articles

Affinity of PET-MRI Tracers for Hypoxic Cells in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Costin I, Marcu L Cells. 2024; 13(12.

PMID: 38920676 PMC: 11202228. DOI: 10.3390/cells13121048.


MRI Assessment of Changes in Tumor Vascularization during Neoadjuvant Anti-Angiogenic Treatment in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients.

Mo T, Brandal S, Geier O, Engebraten O, Nilsen L, Kristensen V Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760629 PMC: 10526130. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184662.


Molecular and functional imaging in cancer-targeted therapy: current applications and future directions.

Bai J, Qiu S, Zhang G Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023; 8(1):89.

PMID: 36849435 PMC: 9971190. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01366-y.


Non-conventional and Investigational PET Radiotracers for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Balma M, Liberini V, Racca M, Laudicella R, Bauckneht M, Buschiazzo A Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:881551.

PMID: 35492341 PMC: 9039137. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.881551.

References
1.
Eschmann S, Paulsen F, Reimold M, Dittmann H, Welz S, Reischl G . Prognostic impact of hypoxia imaging with 18F-misonidazole PET in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer before radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2005; 46(2):253-60. View

2.
Fizazi K, Morat L, Chauveinc L, Prapotnich D, De Crevoisier R, Escudier B . High detection rate of circulating tumor cells in blood of patients with prostate cancer using telomerase activity. Ann Oncol. 2007; 18(3):518-21. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl419. View

3.
Scherpereel A, Gentina T, Grigoriu B, Senechal S, Janin A, Tsicopoulos A . Overexpression of endocan induces tumor formation. Cancer Res. 2003; 63(18):6084-9. View

4.
Cheng C, Pounds S . False discovery rate paradigms for statistical analyses of microarray gene expression data. Bioinformation. 2007; 1(10):436-46. PMC: 1896060. DOI: 10.6026/97320630001436. View

5.
Sanghera B, Wong W, Sonoda L, Beynon G, Makris A, Woolf D . FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response. Indian J Nucl Med. 2014; 29(2):65-73. PMC: 3996774. DOI: 10.4103/0972-3919.130274. View