» Articles » PMID: 34297250

Comparison of Two Fascial Defect Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2021 Jul 23
PMID 34297250
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Currently there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach to an incisional hernia measuring less than 10 cm. Certain hernia features including defect size, intra-abdominal adhesions, and overlying scar/skin properties contribute to choosing an open versus a laparoscopic approach. This retrospective cohort study was designed to compare incisional hernia defects repaired with laparoscopic suture closure to a hybrid approach with open defect closure, both with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) reinforcement.

Methods: We identified 164 consecutive patients who underwent incisional hernia repair from two centers, North York General Hospital (NYGH) and Humber River Hospital (HRH) between 2015 and 2020. Patients were grouped by totally laparoscopic or hybrid fascial closure. Both techniques included laparoscopically placed intra-peritoneal mesh with 5 cm of overlap in all directions. Patients were analyzed by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ASA class and hernia size. Primary outcomes included surgical site infection (SSI), other wound complications including seroma/hematoma, length of hospital stay, pain reported at follow-up appointment, and hernia recurrence.

Results: Post-operative pain, surgical site infections and seromas did not differ between the totally laparoscopic and hybrid approach. The recurrence rates were 5.8% and 6.8% for the laparoscopic and hybrid group, respectively, which were not significantly different. The time to recurrence was 15 months (range 8-12) in the laparoscopic group and 7 months (range 6-36) in the hybrid group, also not significantly different. The hernia defect size and BMI were significantly higher in the hybrid group, without increased wound complications.

Conclusion: These results suggest that a hybrid approach to incisional ventral hernia repair with open defect closure is comparable to a totally laparoscopic closure. The hybrid technique can help facilitate fascial closure and resection of the hernia sac in patients with higher BMI and hernia defects up to 6 cm.

Citing Articles

Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marcolin P, Motter S, Brandao G, Lima D, Trindade B, Poli de Figueiredo S Hernia. 2024; 28(6):2055-2067.

PMID: 38990230 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03105-w.


Comment to: "Comparison of two fascial defect closure methods for laparoscopic incisional hernia repair".

Sahu R, Anand A, Singh P, Kumar M Hernia. 2021; 26(4):1223-1224.

PMID: 34453626 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02482-w.

References
1.
Pamela D, Roberto C, Francesco L, Umberto M, Carla M, Vincenzo N . Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic colectomy: a case report and literature review. ISRN Surg. 2011; 2011:725601. PMC: 3200298. DOI: 10.5402/2011/725601. View

2.
Mudge M, Hughes L . Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg. 1985; 72(1):70-1. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800720127. View

3.
Sneiders D, Yurtkap Y, Kroese L, Kleinrensink G, Lange J, Gillion J . Risk Factors for Incarceration in Patients with Primary Abdominal Wall and Incisional Hernias: A Prospective Study in 4472 Patients. World J Surg. 2019; 43(8):1906-1913. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-04989-x. View

4.
Ahonen-Siirtola M, Nevala T, Vironen J, Kossi J, Pinta T, Niemelainen S . Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomised multicentre study, 1-year results. Surg Endosc. 2019; 34(1):88-95. PMC: 6946755. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06735-9. View

5.
Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons N, Nunes Q, Daniels I, Smart N . Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2016; 103(12):1598-1607. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10268. View