» Articles » PMID: 34296107

Shared Numerosity Representations Across Formats and Tasks Revealed with 7 Tesla FMRI: Decoding, Generalization, and Individual Differences in Behavior

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 23
PMID 34296107
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Debate continues on whether encoding of symbolic number is grounded in nonsymbolic numerical magnitudes. Nevertheless, fluency of perceiving both number formats, and translating between them, predicts math skills across the life span. Therefore, this study asked if numbers share cortical activation patterns across formats and tasks, and whether neural response to number predicts math-related behaviors. We analyzed patterns of neural activation using 7 Tesla functional magnetic resonance imaging in a sample of 39 healthy adults. Discrimination was successful between numerosities 2, 4, 6, and 8 dots and generalized to activation patterns of the same numerosities represented as Arabic digits in the bilateral parietal lobes and left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) (and vice versa). This indicates that numerosity-specific neural resources are shared between formats. Generalization was also successful across tasks where participants either identified or compared numerosities in bilateral parietal lobes and IFG. Individual differences in decoding did not relate to performance on a number comparison task completed outside of the scanner, but generalization between formats and across tasks negatively related to math achievement in the parietal lobes. Together, these findings suggest that individual differences in representational specificity within format and task contexts relate to mathematical expertise.

Citing Articles

Neural Representation Precision of Distance Predicts Children's Arithmetic Performance.

Zhao H, Qi W, Xu J, Yao Y, Lyu J, Yang J Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(4):e70184.

PMID: 40035352 PMC: 11877336. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70184.


Short-term number sense training recapitulates long-term neurodevelopmental changes from childhood to adolescence.

Park Y, Zhang Y, Chang H, Menon V Dev Sci. 2024; 27(5):e13524.

PMID: 38695515 PMC: 11343340. DOI: 10.1111/desc.13524.


Integrated number sense tutoring remediates aberrant neural representations in children with mathematical disabilities.

Park Y, Zhang Y, Schwartz F, Iuculano T, Chang H, Menon V bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38645139 PMC: 11030345. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.09.587577.


Human brain representations of internally generated outcomes of approximate calculation revealed by ultra-high-field brain imaging.

Czajko S, Vignaud A, Eger E Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):572.

PMID: 38233387 PMC: 10794709. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44810-5.


Role of articulatory motor networks in perceptual categorization of speech signals: a 7T fMRI study.

Lankinen K, Ahveninen J, Uluc I, Daneshzand M, Mareyam A, Kirsch J Cereb Cortex. 2023; 33(24):11517-11525.

PMID: 37851854 PMC: 10724868. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad384.


References
1.
Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E . Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(7):307-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002. View

2.
Simon O, Mangin J, Cohen L, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S . Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron. 2002; 33(3):475-87. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00575-5. View

3.
Piazza M, Izard V, Pinel P, Le Bihan D, Dehaene S . Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron. 2004; 44(3):547-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014. View

4.
Carey S, Barner D . Ontogenetic Origins of Human Integer Representations. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019; 23(10):823-835. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.004. View

5.
Wilkey E, Barone J, Mazzocco M, Vogel S, Price G . The effect of visual parameters on neural activation during nonsymbolic number comparison and its relation to math competency. Neuroimage. 2017; 159:430-442. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.023. View