» Articles » PMID: 34295514

Impact of Interracial Contact on Inferring Mental States from Facial Expressions

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jul 23
PMID 34295514
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although decades of research have shown that intergroup contact critically impacts person perception and evaluation, little is known about how contact shapes the ability to infer others' mental states from facial cues (commonly referred to as mentalizing). In a pair of studies, we demonstrated that interracial contact and motivation to attend to faces jointly influence White perceivers' ability to infer mental states based on facial expressions displaying secondary emotions from both White targets alone (study 1) and White and Black targets (study 2; pre-registered). Consistent with previous work on the effect of motivation and interracial contact on other-race face memory, we found that motivation and interracial contact interacted to shape perceivers' accuracy at inferring mental states from secondary emotions. When motivated to attend to the task, high-contact White perceivers were more accurate at inferring both Black and White targets' mental states; unexpectedly, the opposite was true for low-contact perceivers. Importantly, the target race did not interact with interracial contact, suggesting that contact is associated with changes in mentalizing irrespective of target race. These findings expand the theoretical understanding and implications of contact for fundamental social cognition.

Citing Articles

Interracial contact shapes racial bias in the learning of person-knowledge.

Welte M, Dang T, Rosenblum S, Kubota J, Cloutier J Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):6.

PMID: 39837957 PMC: 11751151. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00187-9.


An ingroup disadvantage in recognizing micro-expressions.

Wu Q, Peng K, Xie Y, Lai Y, Liu X, Zhao Z Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1050068.

PMID: 36507018 PMC: 9732534. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1050068.


Interracial contact differentially shapes brain networks involved in social and non-social judgments from faces: a combination of univariate and multivariate approaches.

Handley G, Kubota J, Cloutier J Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021; 17(2):218-230.

PMID: 34273899 PMC: 8847903. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsab090.

References
1.
Handley G, Kubota J, Li T, Cloutier J . Black "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" task: The development of a task assessing mentalizing from black faces. PLoS One. 2019; 14(9):e0221867. PMC: 6752818. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221867. View

2.
Malpass R, Kravitz J . Recognition for faces of own and other race. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1969; 13(4):330-4. DOI: 10.1037/h0028434. View

3.
Wickline V, Bailey W, Nowicki S . Cultural in-group advantage: emotion recognition in African American and European American faces and voices. J Genet Psychol. 2009; 170(1):5-29. DOI: 10.3200/GNTP.170.1.5-30. View

4.
Gauthier I, Williams P, Tarr M, Tanaka J . Training 'greeble' experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Res. 1998; 38(15-16):2401-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00442-2. View

5.
Han S . Neurocognitive Basis of Racial Ingroup Bias in Empathy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018; 22(5):400-421. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.013. View