» Articles » PMID: 34295465

Intraperitoneal Migration of an Intrauterine Device (IUD): A Case Report

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2021 Jul 23
PMID 34295465
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The IUD is one of the most widely used reversible, long-term contraceptive methods in the world. About 80% of IUDs are found in the peritoneal cavity after uterine perforation.

Case Report: A 27-year-old female patient presented with chronic pelvic pain with minimal metrorrhagia for 8 months on IUD. On examination, there was no IUD thread. Pelvic ultrasound showed a hypoechoic, heterogeneous, poorly limited formation measuring 3 × 2.68 cm. Abdominal-pelvic CT scan showed hyperdense supravesical material surrounded by a hypo-dense, well-limited collection measuring 26 × 25 mm. Laparoscopy showed an anterior peritoneal collection above the bladder containing the IUD, a uterus, adnexa, and a bladder without abnormality. The IUD was removed after incision of the collection and aspiration of the pus.

Discussion: The IUD is one of the most widely used long-term reversible contraceptive methods in the world. But like any foreign body, it can present complications, notably migration after uterine perforation, which remains rare, and even rarer peritoneal localization. The clinical diagnosis is not always obvious, and additional examinations are necessary to locate the device, including endovaginal ultrasound, a CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging.WHO recommends surgical removal of the migrated IUD by minimally invasive methods, including hysteroscopy, cystoscopy, colonoscopy, or laparoscopy, depending on the location of the IUD.

Conclusion: IUDs are effective contraceptive measures, and the majority of patients with uterine perforation by IUD migration are asymptomatic. Diagnosis is based on a thorough gynecologic analysis and appropriate radiologic imaging.

Citing Articles

Migrated intra-uterine device to infra-umbilical skin: a rare case report.

Addis N, Sibhat Y, Molla Y, Mengestu W, Seid A, Damite M BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):672.

PMID: 39736668 PMC: 11684260. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03522-0.


Perforation, Migration, and Omentum Embedding of a Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device: A Case Report.

Gomez-Arciniega K, Palomares-Castillo E, Benitez-Jauregui H, Gastelum-Sarabia J, Ayala-Lopez M Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67198.

PMID: 39295680 PMC: 11410415. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67198.


Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device into the bladder complicated by stone formation an exceptional complication: case report and literature review.

Houmaid H, Harou K, Fakhir B, Bassir A, Boukhanni L, Aboulfalah A Contracept Reprod Med. 2024; 9(1):42.

PMID: 39192372 PMC: 11351088. DOI: 10.1186/s40834-024-00302-x.


Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Migrated in the Urinary Tract: Case Report and Extensive Literature Review.

Varlas V, Meianu A, Radoi A, Balescu I, Bacalbasa N, Varlas R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064273 PMC: 11278257. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144233.


Intrauterine device (IUD) migration to the fallopian tube: a rare location for a translocated IUD with no visceral injury.

Wangwe P, Awadh N, Angelus M Contracept Reprod Med. 2024; 9(1):36.

PMID: 39054493 PMC: 11270885. DOI: 10.1186/s40834-024-00278-8.


References
1.
Aydogdu O, Pulat H . Asymptomatic far-migration of an intrauterine device into the abdominal cavity: A rare entity. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012; 6(3):E134-6. PMC: 3377742. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.11100. View

2.
Nouioui M, Taktak T, Mokadem S, Mediouni H, Khiari R, Ghozzi S . A Mislocated Intrauterine Device Migrating to the Urinary Bladder: An Uncommon Complication Leading to Stone Formation. Case Rep Urol. 2020; 2020:2091915. PMC: 7166296. DOI: 10.1155/2020/2091915. View

3.
Weerasekera A, Wijesinghe P, Nugaduwa N . Sigmoid colocolic fistula caused by intrauterine device migration: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014; 8:81. PMC: 3946035. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-81. View

4.
Sun C, Chang C, Yu M . Far-migrated intra-abdominal intrauterine device with abdominal pain. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 47(2):244-6. DOI: 10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60095-9. View

5.
Sundaram A, Vaughan B, Kost K, Bankole A, Finer L, Singh S . Contraceptive Failure in the United States: Estimates from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017; 49(1):7-16. PMC: 5363251. DOI: 10.1363/psrh.12017. View