» Articles » PMID: 34295298

The Effect of Robotic Assisted Gait Training With Lokomat® on Balance Control After Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Jul 23
PMID 34295298
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Disturbances of balance control are common after stroke, affecting the quality of gait and increasing the risk of falls. Because balance and gait disorders may persist also in the chronic stage, reducing individual independence and participation, they represent primary goals of neurorehabilitation programs. For this purpose, in recent years, numerous technological devices have been developed, among which one of the most widespread is the Lokomat®, an actuated exoskeleton that guide the patient's limbs, simulating a symmetrical bilateral gait. Preliminary evidence suggests that beyond gait parameters, robotic assisted gait training may also improve balance. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarize evidence about the effectiveness of Lokomat® in improving balance in stroke patients. Randomized controlled trials published between January 1989 and August 2020, comparing Lokomat® training to conventional therapy for stroke patients, were retrieved from seven electronic databases. Balance, assessed by means of validated clinical scales, was considered as outcome measure. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (no. CRD42020197531). After the removal of the duplicates, according to the inclusion criteria, 13 studies were selected, involving 445 subacute or chronic stroke patients. Eleven papers contributed to three meta-analyses. Favorable results for recovery of balance in stroke survivors treated with Lokomat® were shown using Timed Up and Go (pooled mean difference = -3.40, 95% CI -4.35 to -2.44; < 0.00001) and Rivermead Mobility Index as outcome measures (pooled mean difference = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.55; < 0.00001). Inconclusive results were found when balance was measured by means of the Berg Balance Scale (pooled mean difference = 0.17, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.60; = 0.44). Overall, most studies have shown beneficial effects of Lokomat® on balance recovery for stroke survivors, at least comparable to conventional physical therapy. However, due to the limited number of studies and their high heterogeneity, further research is needed to draw more solid and definitive conclusions.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Robotic Devices for Medical Rehabilitation: An Umbrella Review.

Kiyono K, Tanabe S, Hirano S, Ii T, Nakagawa Y, Tan K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518755 PMC: 11546060. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216616.


Assessing the Efficacy of Lokomat Training in Pediatric Physiotherapy for Cerebral Palsy: A Progress Evaluation.

Blazkiewicz M, Hadamus A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518555 PMC: 11545871. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216417.


New protocol for early robot-assisted gait training after spinal surgery.

Jee S, Jang C, Shin S, Kim Y, Park J Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1450883.

PMID: 39507713 PMC: 11539955. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1450883.


Efficacy and safety of using a unilateral lower limb exoskeleton combined with conventional treatment in post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial.

Jin Y, Xiong B, Chen L, Zhao W, Li Z, Zhang C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1441986.

PMID: 39359258 PMC: 11445659. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1441986.


Efficacy of robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity function in subacute stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hu M, Wang S, Wu C, Li K, Geng Z, Xu G J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):165.

PMID: 39300491 PMC: 11411785. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01463-1.


References
1.
Schardt C, Adams M, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P . Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007; 7:16. PMC: 1904193. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-16. View

2.
Nam K, Kim H, Kwon B, Park J, Lee H, Yoo A . Robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14(1):24. PMC: 5363005. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0232-3. View

3.
Iosa M, Morone G, Cherubini A, Paolucci S . The Three Laws of Neurorobotics: A Review on What Neurorehabilitation Robots Should Do for Patients and Clinicians. J Med Biol Eng. 2016; 36:1-11. PMC: 4791450. DOI: 10.1007/s40846-016-0115-2. View

4.
Guralnik J, Simonsick E, Ferrucci L, Glynn R, Berkman L, Blazer D . A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994; 49(2):M85-94. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85. View

5.
Maher C, Sherrington C, Herbert R, Moseley A, Elkins M . Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003; 83(8):713-21. View