» Articles » PMID: 34295150

The Potential Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Carbapenem Resistant Clinical Isolates Harboring Different Carbapenemase Types in a Thai University Hospital

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Jul 23
PMID 34295150
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: MBL and OXA-48 genes in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) have emerged as a major public health problem worldwide, including Thailand. Due to the lack of susceptibility data and dosing regimens of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) against CRE in Thailand, especially in colistin-resistant era, we aimed to demonstrate in vitro susceptibility data of CZA and optimal dose based on Monte Carlo simulation of CZA to expand the treatment options.

Patients And Methods: We collected 49 carbapenem-resistant (CRKP) clinical isolates from unique patients at Phramongkutklao Hospital (June-October 2020). CZA disk diffusion and E-test testing were performed to obtain minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Each drug regimen was simulated using the Monte Carlo technique to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR).

Results: The most common genotypes of CRKP were (53.1%) and + (42.8%). CZA showed 47.7% and 90.5% susceptible rate against all genotypes of carbapenemases and OXA-48 type CRKP isolates. The MIC and MIC of CZA against CRKP were 2 and >256 µg/mL. The categorical agreement (CA) between disk diffusion and E-test testing of CZA against CRKP was 95.4%. The CZA dosing regimens of 2.5 g infused 2-3 h every 8 h achieved ≥90% of the target of free ceftazidime plasma concentration over MIC (%Time >MIC) ≥50% and 100% against isolates MICs of ≤8 and ≤8 µg/mL, respectively. The avibactam regimens also provided 100%Time at 0.5 µg/mL. Based on CFR ≥90%, no CZA regimens were effective against all of the studied CRKP isolates except CRKP carrying OXA-48.

Conclusion: CZA exhibited a fairly susceptible rate among the OXA-48-positive isolates in Thailand. The current suggested dose of CZA with prolonged infusion appears appropriate to achieve the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets of ceftazidime and avibactam against CRKP carrying .

Citing Articles

Global trends of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in gram-negative bacteria: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang Y, Sholeh M, Yang L, Shakourzadeh M, Beig M, Azizian K Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2025; 14(1):10.

PMID: 39934901 PMC: 11818042. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-025-01518-5.


Efficacy and Safety of Oral Neomycin for the Decolonization of Carbapenem-Resistant : An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Tancharoen L, Srisomnuek A, Tiengrim S, Thamthaweechok N, Tangkorskul T, Thamlikitkul V Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39200081 PMC: 11351571. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13080781.


Adequacy of the Dosing and Infusion Time of Ceftazidime/Avibactam for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: A PK/PD Simulation Study.

Han Y, Zhu J, Liu J, Zheng Y, Liang G, Yang Y Infect Drug Resist. 2024; 17:2823-2832.

PMID: 39005857 PMC: 11244631. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S469313.


Mortality factors and antibiotic options in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infections: Insights from a high-prevalence setting with co-occurring NDM-1 and OXA-48.

Karnmueng P, Montakantikul P, Paiboonvong T, Plongla R, Chatsuwan T, Chumnumwat S Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 17(6):e13855.

PMID: 38853376 PMC: 11163016. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13855.


The Challenge of Overcoming Antibiotic Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: "Attack on Titan".

Mancuso G, De Gaetano S, Midiri A, Zummo S, Biondo C Microorganisms. 2023; 11(8).

PMID: 37630472 PMC: 10456941. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11081912.


References
1.
Netikul T, Kiratisin P . Genetic Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and the Spread of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumonia ST340 at a University Hospital in Thailand. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0139116. PMC: 4583293. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139116. View

2.
Shields R, Clancy C, Pasculle A, Press E, Haidar G, Hao B . Verification of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing Methods against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Microbiol. 2017; 56(2). PMC: 5786715. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01093-17. View

3.
Tamma P, Aitken S, Bonomo R, Mathers A, van Duin D, Clancy C . Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P..... Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 72(7):e169-e183. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1478. View

4.
Osano E, Arakawa Y, Wacharotayankun R, Ohta M, Horii T, Ito H . Molecular characterization of an enterobacterial metallo beta-lactamase found in a clinical isolate of Serratia marcescens that shows imipenem resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994; 38(1):71-8. PMC: 284399. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.38.1.71. View

5.
Wong D, van Duin D . Novel Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors: Unlocking Their Potential in Therapy. Drugs. 2017; 77(6):615-628. PMC: 5473160. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-017-0725-1. View