» Articles » PMID: 34294147

Conservative Oxygen Therapy for Critically Ill Patients: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2021 Jul 23
PMID 34294147
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Conservative oxygen strategy is recommended in acute illness while its benefit in ICU patients remains controversial. Therefore, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine such oxygen strategies' effect and safety in ICU patients.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database from inception to Feb 15, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a conservative oxygen strategy to a conventional strategy in critically ill patients were included. Results were expressed as mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome was the longest follow-up mortality. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also investigated to test the robustness of the primary outcome.

Results: We included seven trials with a total of 5265 patients. In general, the conventional group had significantly higher SpO or PaO than that in the conservative group. No statistically significant differences were found in the longest follow-up mortality (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.10; I=18%; P=0.34) between the two oxygen strategies when pooling studies enrolling subjects with various degrees of hypoxemia. Further sensitivity analysis showed that ICU patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia (PaO/FiO >100 mmHg) had significantly lower mortality (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05-1.46; I=0%; P=0.01) when receiving conservative oxygen therapy. These findings were also confirmed in other study periods. Additional, secondary outcomes of the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in the ICU and hospital, change in sequential organ failure assessment score, and adverse events were comparable between the two strategies.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that conservative oxygen therapy strategy did not improve the prognosis of the overall ICU patients. The subgroup of ICU patients with mild to moderate hypoxemia might obtain prognosis benefit from such a strategy without affecting other critical clinical results.

Citing Articles

Heterogeneity of treatment effect: the case for individualising oxygen therapy in critically ill patients.

Martin D, Grocott M Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):50.

PMID: 39875948 PMC: 11776231. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05254-5.


Evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a conservative approach to oxygen therapy for invasively ventilated adults in intensive care: Protocol for the UK-ROX trial.

Martin D, Shahid T, Gould D, Richards-Belle A, Doidge J, Camsooksai J J Intensive Care Soc. 2024; 25(2):223-230.

PMID: 38737312 PMC: 11086723. DOI: 10.1177/17511437241239880.


Conservative versus liberal oxygen therapy for intensive care unit patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Li X, Dai B, Hou H, Zhao H, Wang W, Kang J Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1):68.

PMID: 38668955 PMC: 11052962. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01300-7.


The effect of conservative oxygen therapy on mortality in adult critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Martin D, McKenna H, Rowan K, Gould D, Mouncey P, Grocott M J Intensive Care Soc. 2023; 24(4):399-408.

PMID: 37841302 PMC: 10572476. DOI: 10.1177/17511437231192385.


Lower Versus Higher Oxygenation Targets for Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.

Abdelbaky A, Elmasry W, Awad A Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41330.

PMID: 37408938 PMC: 10318567. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41330.


References
1.
Schjorring O, Klitgaard T, Perner A, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Siegemund M . Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(14):1301-1311. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032510. View

2.
Calzia E, Asfar P, Hauser B, Matejovic M, Ballestra C, Radermacher P . Hyperoxia may be beneficial. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38(10 Suppl):S559-68. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f1fe70. View

3.
Cornet A, Kooter A, Peters M, Smulders Y . The potential harm of oxygen therapy in medical emergencies. Crit Care. 2013; 17(2):313. PMC: 3672526. DOI: 10.1186/cc12554. View

4.
Yang X, Shang Y, Yuan S . Low versus high pulse oxygen saturation directed oxygen therapy in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Thorac Dis. 2019; 11(10):4234-4240. PMC: 6837987. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.09.66. View

5.
Chu D, Kim L, Young P, Zamiri N, Almenawer S, Jaeschke R . Mortality and morbidity in acutely ill adults treated with liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy (IOTA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018; 391(10131):1693-1705. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30479-3. View