» Articles » PMID: 34293007

Measuring Leadership an Assessment of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Jul 22
PMID 34293007
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although the most used measure of transformational leadership, the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), has been the subject of intense scrutiny among leadership scholars, little interest has been shown in analyzing the relationship between its underlying constructs and / or their measures. The present study identifies a formative factor structure for most MLQ first-order factors, replacing the usual reflective model. We demonstrate the value of this structure using data from two different samples. First, we applied the MLQ to a sample of 129 police officers from the Catalan Police workforce. Second, we ran an online survey with 300 US citizens. We argue that three second-order factors (transformational, transactional, and laissez faire) should be used as emergent aggregate multidimensional models to describe three different leadership styles, challenging the ubiquitous multidimensional latent models favored in the extant literature. We then propose that transformational/charismatic leadership should be treated as a multidimensional emergent profile model, replacing the leadership development order of precedence, which is dominant in modern leadership research.

Citing Articles

Surviving a crisis: A multilevel model of leadership styles, employees' psychological capital and organizational resilience.

Njaramba F, Olukuru J PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318515.

PMID: 39913619 PMC: 11801540. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318515.


Leadership as a determinant of need fulfillment: implications for meta-theory, methods, and practice.

Pincus J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1427072.

PMID: 39171223 PMC: 11337100. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1427072.


Full range leadership style and its effect on effectiveness, employee satisfaction, and extra effort: an empirical study.

Garzon-Lasso F, Serrano-Malebran J, Arenas-Arango S, Molina C Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1380935.

PMID: 39118842 PMC: 11307206. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1380935.


Measuring educational leadership in Singapore: re-examining the psychometric properties of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.

Wang J, Liu W, Kee Y, Ng B, Chua L, Hu L Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1280038.

PMID: 38046122 PMC: 10690820. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1280038.


Gender Differences in the Relationships Between Coach Transformational Leadership and Player Satisfaction and Commitment: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Kim H, Cruz A Front Psychol. 2022; 13:915391.

PMID: 35800950 PMC: 9253673. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915391.


References
1.
Judge T, Piccolo R . Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J Appl Psychol. 2004; 89(5):755-68. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755. View

2.
Hardin A . A call for theory to support the use of causal-formative indicators: A commentary on Bollen and Diamantopoulos (2017). Psychol Methods. 2017; 22(3):597-604. DOI: 10.1037/met0000115. View

3.
Edwards J, Bagozzi R . On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychol Methods. 2000; 5(2):155-74. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.2.155. View

4.
Mackenzie S, Podsakoff P, Jarvis C . The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. J Appl Psychol. 2005; 90(4):710-30. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710. View

5.
De Hoogh A, Den Hartog D . Neuroticism and locus of control as moderators of the relationships of charismatic and autocratic leadership with burnout. J Appl Psychol. 2009; 94(4):1058-67. DOI: 10.1037/a0016253. View