» Articles » PMID: 34290793

Outcome of Abdominal Binder in Midline Abdominal Wound Dehiscence in Terms of Pain, Psychological Satisfaction and Need for Reclosure

Overview
Journal Pak J Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jul 22
PMID 34290793
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the role of abdominal binder in patients with midline wound dehiscence after elective or emergency laparotomy in terms of pain, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure.

Methods: It was a comparative study done at EAST Surgical Ward of Mayo Hospital, Lahore from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019. One hundred and sixty-two (162) patients were included in this study with post-operative midline abdominal wound dehiscence and after informed consent by consecutive non probability sampling technique. Patients were divided into two groups by lottery method into eighty-one patients each. Group-A included patients where abdominal binder was applied and Group-B included patients without abdominal binder. In both groups pain score, psychological satisfaction and need for reclosure was assessed and compared.

Results: Patients with abdominal binder shows significantly less pain (P value =0.000) and more psychological satisfaction (P value = 0.000) as compared to the patients where abdominal binder was not used. However, there was no difference in reducing the need for reclosure in patients who use abdominal binder (P value = 0.063).

Conclusion: Although abdominal binder helps in reducing the pain and improving the psychological satisfaction in patients with midline abdominal wound dehiscence yet it doesn't help in healing of wound and reclosure of the dehisced abdominal wound is needed.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Honey & Povidone Iodine dressings in Post-Cesarean Surgical Site Wound Infection Healing.

Majid E, Pathan S, Zuberi B, Rehman M, Malik S Pak J Med Sci. 2023; 39(6):1803-1808.

PMID: 37936758 PMC: 10626100. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.7499.

References
1.
Arici E, Tastan S, Can M . The effect of using an abdominal binder on postoperative gastrointestinal function, mobilization, pulmonary function, and pain in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016; 62:108-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.07.017. View

2.
Kliethermes C, Blazek K, Ali K, Nijjar J, Kliethermes S, Guan X . A Randomized Controlled Trial for Abdominal Binder Use after Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25(5):842-847. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.021. View

3.
Fu R, Weinstein A, Chang M, Argenziano M, Ascherman J, Rohde C . Risk factors of infected sternal wounds versus sterile wound dehiscence. J Surg Res. 2015; 200(1):400-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.07.045. View

4.
Marcarelli M, Trovato L, Novarese E, Riccio M, Graziano A . Rigenera protocol in the treatment of surgical wound dehiscence. Int Wound J. 2016; 14(1):277-281. PMC: 7949493. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12601. View

5.
Gommesen D, Nohr E, Drue H, Qvist N, Rasch V . Obstetric perineal tears: risk factors, wound infection and dehiscence: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 300(1):67-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05165-1. View