» Articles » PMID: 34289908

The Development of a Contextually Appropriate Measure of Psychological Distress in Sierra Leone

Overview
Journal BMC Psychol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychology
Date 2021 Jul 22
PMID 34289908
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Studies of psychological distress in Sierra Leone have typically used measures which were developed for use in other contexts, and which often have not been adapted or validated for use in Sierra Leone. This has resulted in a lack of reliable information about the patterns of psychological distress within the population, which is a barrier to the development of effective and appropriate mental health services. The aim of the study was to develop a locally-appropriate measure of psychological distress for Sierra Leone.

Methods: The new measure consists of two instruments: the Sierra Leone Psychological Distress Scale (SLPDS) and a gendered measure of ability to carry out daily tasks-a Function scale-as an indication of the severity of distress. A three-phase mixed methods exploratory sequential study was conducted. Phase 1 was item generation and testing, leading to the development of a set of potential items for both instruments. Phase 2 was a small pilot study (N = 202) leading to the selection of the final set of items for both measures. Phase 3 was a validation phase where the SLPDS and the Function scale were administered with a larger sample of 904 respondents. Item analysis was used to assess the internal consistency of the scales, and Exploratory Factor Analysis to explore the properties of the SLPDS.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis using the principal axis factoring with an oblique rotation identified a three-factor structure for the 18-item SLPDS. Internal consistency for the SLPDS (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and three subscales was good (Cronbach's alpha > 0.73). The internal reliability of the male and female versions of the Function scale was also found to be acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90 for the female scale and 0.79 for the male scale).

Conclusions: Together the SLPD and Function scales provide a locally-validated tool which will enable government bodies and local and international non-governmental organisations in Sierra Leone to assess mental health and psychosocial needs. This will support both effective service provision and the evaluation of initiatives designed to improve mental health and psychosocial wellbeing.

Citing Articles

Policy and practice implications of contextual understanding of - and tools to address - mental health and psychosocial support needs in Sierra Leone.

Ager A, Horn R, Bah A, Wurie H, Samai M Front Psychiatry. 2025; 16:1419448.

PMID: 40018682 PMC: 11866056. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1419448.


Developing and validating the Sierra Leone perinatal psychological distress scale through an emic-etic approach.

Bah A, Wurie H, Samai M, Horn R, Ager A J Affect Disord Rep. 2025; 19():100852.

PMID: 39850399 PMC: 11752488. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100852.


Social determinants of psychological distress in Sierra Leone.

Jailobaeva K, Horn R, Arakelyan S, Diaconu K, Kamara A, Ager A Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022; 57(9):1781-1793.

PMID: 35441330 PMC: 9375741. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02278-y.

References
1.
Rasmussen A, Jayawickreme N . Introduction to the special collection: developing valid psychological measures for populations impacted by humanitarian disasters. Confl Health. 2020; 14:10. PMC: 7033927. DOI: 10.1186/s13031-020-00260-6. View

2.
Bolton P, Neugebauer R, Ndogoni L . Prevalence of depression in rural Rwanda based on symptom and functional criteria. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002; 190(9):631-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-200209000-00009. View

3.
Rasmussen A, Ventevogel P, Sancilio A, Eggerman M, Panter-Brick C . Comparing the validity of the self reporting questionnaire and the Afghan symptom checklist: dysphoria, aggression, and gender in transcultural assessment of mental health. BMC Psychiatry. 2014; 14:206. PMC: 4107970. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-206. View

4.
MacCallum R, Widaman K, Preacher K, Hong S . Sample Size in Factor Analysis: The Role of Model Error. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 36(4):611-37. DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06. View

5.
Suarez-Alvarez J, Pedrosa I, Lozano L, Garcia-Cueto E, Cuesta M, Muniz J . Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema. 2018; 30(2):149-158. DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2018.33. View