» Articles » PMID: 34288630

Variation in Auditory Experience Affects Language and Executive Function Skills in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing

Overview
Journal Ear Hear
Date 2021 Jul 21
PMID 34288630
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Children who are hard of hearing (CHH) experience delays in spoken language and executive function, but the mechanisms for these deficits remain unresolved. Differences in auditory experience and language skills have been examined as contributing factors to deficits in executive function, primarily with children who are deaf and children with cochlear implants. The theoretical model of cumulative auditory experience quantifies auditory dosage as how much speech is audible and how often children wear their hearing aids. CHH with higher auditory dosage have better language outcomes than peers with less auditory dosage. However, the effects of auditory experience on executive function have not been studied in CHH. The goal of this study was to examine the influences of auditory experience and language skills on the development of executive function in CHH.

Design: We collected measures of aided speech audibility, hearing aid use, executive function, and receptive vocabulary in 177 CHH and 86 children with typical hearing who were 5- to 10 years old and matched for socioeconomic status and nonverbal intelligence. Auditory dosage was calculated by combining each child's average hours of hearing aid use with their audibility for speech to create a variable that quantifies individual differences in auditory access.

Results: CHH had lower receptive vocabulary and deficits in executive function related to working memory and selective attention compared to peers with typical hearing. CHH with greater auditory dosage had higher receptive vocabulary than CHH with lower auditory dosage. Better receptive vocabulary was associated with better scores on executive function measures related to working memory and attention. Auditory dosage was also directly associated with measures of verbal working memory.

Conclusions: CHH have deficits in language and some, but not all, areas of executive function related to working memory and attention. Auditory dosage was associated with language abilities and verbal working memory. Language was associated with individual differences in executive function skills related to attention and working memory. These results provide support for systems theories regarding the development of executive function in CHH. Interventions that improve auditory access and language may be effective for improving executive function related to working memory and attention in CHH.

Citing Articles

Consistency of hearing aid use, speech perception and vocabulary in hearing impaired children.

Santos M, Pereira R, Mendes B, Novaes B Codas. 2024; 36(6):e20240017.

PMID: 39536193 PMC: 11610596. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242024017pt.


A Virtual Reality Platform for Evaluating Deficits in Executive Functions in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children-Relation to Daily Function and to Quality of Life.

Hamed-Daher S, Josman N, Klinger E, Engel-Yeger B Children (Basel). 2024; 11(9).

PMID: 39334655 PMC: 11430522. DOI: 10.3390/children11091123.


The Impact of Executive Dysfunction on Anxiety in Hearing-Impaired College Students: Smartphone Addiction as a Mediator and Academic Procrastination as a Moderator.

Xiong Z, Li G, Chen J, Peng L Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024; 17:2853-2863.

PMID: 39099586 PMC: 11297489. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S470293.


Association of domain-general speed of information processing with spoken language outcomes in prelingually-deaf children with cochlear implants.

Kronenberger W, Castellanos I, Pisoni D Hear Res. 2024; 450:109069.

PMID: 38889562 PMC: 11260235. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109069.


Story Generation and Narrative Retells in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing and Hearing Children.

Walker E, Harrison M, Baumann R, Moeller M, Sorensen E, Oleson J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023; 66(9):3550-3573.

PMID: 37591235 PMC: 10558149. DOI: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00084.


References
1.
Khan S, Edwards L, Langdon D . The cognition and behaviour of children with cochlear implants, children with hearing aids and their hearing peers: a comparison. Audiol Neurootol. 2005; 10(2):117-26. DOI: 10.1159/000083367. View

2.
Marshall C, Jones A, Denmark T, Mason K, Atkinson J, Botting N . Deaf children's non-verbal working memory is impacted by their language experience. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:527. PMC: 4419661. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00527. View

3.
Hall M, Eigsti I, Bortfeld H, Lillo-Martin D . Auditory Deprivation Does Not Impair Executive Function, But Language Deprivation Might: Evidence From a Parent-Report Measure in Deaf Native Signing Children. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016; 22(1):9-21. PMC: 5189172. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enw054. View

4.
Walker E, McCreery R, Spratford M, Oleson J, Van Buren J, Bentler R . Trends and Predictors of Longitudinal Hearing Aid Use for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing. Ear Hear. 2016; 36 Suppl 1:38S-47S. PMC: 4704121. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000208. View

5.
Walker E, Redfern A, Oleson J . Linear Mixed-Model Analysis to Examine Longitudinal Trajectories in Vocabulary Depth and Breadth in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(3):525-542. PMC: 6802902. DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-ASTM-18-0250. View