» Articles » PMID: 34286162

Spatial Sensitivity of Human Circadian Response: Melatonin Suppression from On-axis and Off-axis Light Exposures

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 21
PMID 34286162
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A better understanding of the spatial sensitivity of the human circadian system to photic stimulation can provide practical solutions for optimized circadian light exposures. Two psychophysical experiments, involving 25 adult participants in Experiment 1 (mean age = 34.0 years [SD 15.5]; 13 females) and 15 adult participants in Experiment 2 (mean age = 43.0 years [SD 12.6]; 12 females), were designed to investigate whether varying only the spatial distribution of luminous stimuli in the environment while maintaining a constant spectrally weighted irradiance at the eye could influence nocturnal melatonin suppression. Two spatial distributions were employed, one where the luminous stimulus was presented On-axis (along the line of sight) and one where two luminous stimuli were both presented Off-axis (laterally displaced at center by 14°). Two narrowband LED light sources, blue (  = 451 nm) for first experiment and green (  = 522 nm) for second experiment, were used in both the On-axis and the Off-axis spatial distributions. The blue luminous stimulus targeting the fovea and parafovea (On-axis) was about three times more effective for suppressing melatonin than the photometrically and spectrally matched stimulus targeting the more peripheral retina (Off-axis). The green luminous stimulus targeting the fovea and parafovea (On-axis) was about two times more effective for suppressing melatonin than the photometrically and spectrally matched stimulus targeting the more peripheral retina (Off-axis).

Citing Articles

The effect of smartphone addiction on the relationship between psychological stress reaction and bedtime procrastination in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Yang Z, Huang J, Li Z, Xu H, Guo C BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):813.

PMID: 37936100 PMC: 10631052. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05276-9.


Electric lighting, adolescent sleep and circadian outcomes, and recommendations for improving light health.

Ricketts E, Joyce D, Rissman A, Burgess H, Colwell C, Lack L Sleep Med Rev. 2022; 64:101667.

PMID: 36064209 PMC: 10693907. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101667.

References
1.
Figueiro M, Bierman A, Bullough J, Rea M . A personal light-treatment device for improving sleep quality in the elderly: dynamics of nocturnal melatonin suppression at two exposure levels. Chronobiol Int. 2009; 26(4):726-39. PMC: 2774221. DOI: 10.1080/07420520902927809. View

2.
Perez-Leon J, Warren E, Allen C, Robinson D, Lane Brown R . Synaptic inputs to retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Eur J Neurosci. 2006; 24(4):1117-23. PMC: 2435212. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04999.x. View

3.
Matynia A, Parikh S, Chen B, Kim P, McNeill D, Nusinowitz S . Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells are the primary but not exclusive circuit for light aversion. Exp Eye Res. 2012; 105:60-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2012.09.012. View

4.
Bumsted K, Hendrickson A . Distribution and development of short-wavelength cones differ between Macaca monkey and human fovea. J Comp Neurol. 1999; 403(4):502-16. View

5.
Packer O, Hendrickson A, Curcio C . Photoreceptor topography of the retina in the adult pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina). J Comp Neurol. 1989; 288(1):165-83. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902880113. View