» Articles » PMID: 34283381

Health-related Quality of Life in Primary Hepatic Cancer: a Systematic Review Assessing the Methodological Properties of Instruments and a Meta-analysis Comparing Treatment Strategies

Overview
Journal Qual Life Res
Date 2021 Jul 20
PMID 34283381
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options in respect to HRQoL are sparse. The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis was, therefore, to identify all available HRQoL tools regarding primary liver cancer, to assess the methodological quality of these HRQoL instruments and to compare surgical, interventional and medical treatments with regard to HRQoL.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE. The methodological quality of all identified HRQoL instruments was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) standard. Consequently, the quality of reporting of HRQoL data was assessed. Finally, wherever possible HRQoL data were extracted and quantitative analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 124 studies using 29 different HRQoL instruments were identified. After the methodological assessment, only 10 instruments fulfilled the psychometric criteria and could be included in subsequent analyses. However, quality of reporting of HRQoL data was insufficient, precluding meta-analyses for 9 instruments.

Conclusion: Using a standardized methodological assessment, specific HRQoL instruments are recommended for use in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. HRQoL data of patients undergoing treatment of primary liver cancers are sparse and reporting falls short of published standards. Meaningful comparison of established treatment options with regard to HRQoL was impossible indicating the need for future research.

Citing Articles

Gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis of 81 studies and 9495 patients.

Arendt N, Kopsida M, Khaled J, Sjoblom M, Heindryckx F Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025; 17:17588359251316663.

PMID: 39926261 PMC: 11806495. DOI: 10.1177/17588359251316663.


Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews.

Elsman E, Mokkink L, Abma I, Aiyegbusi O, Chiarotto A, Haywood K Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(10):2593-2609.

PMID: 38961010 PMC: 11452433. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03706-z.


Modular multimodal hospital-home chain physical activity rehabilitation programme (3M2H-PARP) in liver cancer: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Chen H, Lu H, Zhou H, Wu B, Dong Z, Zhang S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e083228.

PMID: 38772899 PMC: 11110592. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083228.


Development of a Patient-Reported Symptom Item Bank for Patients with Hepatobiliary or Pancreatic Malignancies: A Systematic Review.

Zhang J, Zhan Y, Chen J, Kang D, Xiang R, Zhang R Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023; 17:199-207.

PMID: 36698859 PMC: 9869794. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S398666.


Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting in 5-Year Quality-of-Life Comparison among Three Surgical Procedures for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Chang D, Chen Y, Chen H, Chiu C, Lee K, Wang J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(1).

PMID: 36612245 PMC: 9818414. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010252.


References
1.
Vilgrain V, Pereira H, Assenat E, Guiu B, Ilonca A, Pageaux G . Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(12):1624-1636. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30683-6. View

2.
Casanovas T, Jane L, Herdman M, Casado A, Garcia B, Prat B . Assessing outcomes in liver disease patients: reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Liver Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (LDQOL 1.0). Value Health. 2010; 13(4):455-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00688.x. View

3.
Cao W, Li J, Hu C, Shen J, Liu X, Xu Y . Symptom clusters and symptom interference of HCC patients undergoing TACE: a cross-sectional study in China. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 21(2):475-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1541-5. View

4.
Chung M, Wang S, Lin C . Symptom Clusters and Impact of Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance on Symptom Experiences of Hepatoma Patients in Taiwan. Cancer Nurs. 2016; 40(5):403-411. DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000417. View

5.
Steel J, Chopra K, Olek M, Carr B . Health-related quality of life: Hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic liver disease, and the general population. Qual Life Res. 2006; 16(2):203-15. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-9111-2. View