» Articles » PMID: 34274150

Evaluation of a Telemedicine Program Managing High-risk Pregnant Women with Pre-existing Diabetes in Arkansas's Medicaid Program

Overview
Journal Semin Perinatol
Date 2021 Jul 18
PMID 34274150
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We aim to evaluate the effects of the telemedicine program, High-Risk Pregnancy Program at University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), on health services utilization and medical expenditures among pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes and their newborns.

Research Design And Methods: The study sample was selected from the Arkansas Medicaid claims linked to infant birth/death certificates and UAMS telemedicine records from 2013 through 2016. We used propensity score matching based on participants' characteristics to create three groups - UAMS telemedicine care, UAMS in-person care, and non-UAMS prenatal care. We compared inpatient and outpatient care services, medication use and caesarean section rates, severe maternal morbidity, infant mortality and preterm birth rates and medical expenditures.

Results: The UAMS telemedicine group had fewer inpatient admissions (1.18 vs 1.31; 95% CI: -0.27, 0.00), lower insulin use rates (41.86% vs 59.88%; 95% CI: -29.00%, -7.05%) and lower maternal care expenditures ($7,846 vs $10,644; 95% CI: -$4,089, -$1,507) compared with the UAMS in-person care group. Women receiving UAMS telemedicine had more prenatal care visits (10.45 vs 8.57; 95% CI: -2.96, -0.81), higher insulin use rates (41.86% vs 26.74%: 95% CI: 4.63%, 25.60%) and similar maternal care expenditures ($7,846 vs $7,051), compared with those receiving non-UAMS in-person care. Caesarean section, severe maternal morbidity, and infant mortality rates were similar across the three groups.

Conclusion: UAMS telemedicine was associated with improved utilization of prenatal care among pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes. Telemedicine services did not differ from usual in-person services in clinical outcomes and medical expenditures.

Citing Articles

Optimising digital clinical consultations in maternity care: a realist review and implementation principles.

Evans C, Clancy G, Evans K, Booth A, Nazmeen B, Sunney C BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e079153.

PMID: 39486829 PMC: 11529580. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079153.


Applications and Challenges of Telemedicine: Privacy-Preservation as a Case Study.

Ansarian M, Baharlouei Z Arch Iran Med. 2024; 26(11):654-661.

PMID: 38310426 PMC: 10864944. DOI: 10.34172/aim.2023.96.


Telehealth in antenatal care: recent insights and advances.

Atkinson J, Hastie R, Walker S, Lindquist A, Tong S BMC Med. 2023; 21(1):332.

PMID: 37649028 PMC: 10470141. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03042-y.


Telemedicine across the continuum of neonatal-perinatal care.

Chuo J, Makkar A, Machut K, Zenge J, Jagarapu J, Azzuqa A Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 27(5):101398.

PMID: 36333212 PMC: 9623499. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2022.101398.