Feasibility of Motor Imagery and Effects of Activating and Relaxing Practice on Autonomic Functions in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomised, Controlled, Assessor-blinded, Pilot Trial

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2021 Jul 13

PMID 34255812

Authors

Turhan Kahraman

Derya Ozer Kaya

Tayfun Isik

Sukriye Cansu Gultekin

Barbara Seebacher

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Motor imagery (MI) is the mental rehearsal of a motor task. Between real and imagined movements, a functional equivalence has been described regarding timing and brain activation. The primary study aim was to investigate the feasibility of MI training focusing on the autonomic function in healthy young people. Further aims were to evaluate participants' MI abilities and compare preliminary effects of activating and relaxing MI on autonomic function and against controls.

Methods: A single-blinded randomised controlled pilot trial was performed. Participants were randomised to the activating MI (1), relaxing MI (2), or control (3) group. Following a MI familiarisation, they practiced home-based kinaesthetic MI for 17 minutes, 5 times/week for 2 weeks. Participants were called once for support. The primary outcome was the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial using predefined criteria. Secondary outcomes were participants' MI ability using the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised, mental chronometry tests, hand laterality judgement and semi-structured interviews, autonomic function.

Results: A total of 35 participants completed the study. The feasibility of a larger study was confirmed, despite 35% attrition related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Excellent MI capabilities were seen in participants, and significant correlations between MI ability measures. Interview results showed that participants accepted or liked both interventions. Seven major themes and insider recommendations for MI interventions emerged. No significant differences and negligible to medium effects were observed in MI ability or autonomic function between baseline and post-intervention measures or between groups.

Conclusions: Results showed that neither activating nor relaxing MI seems to change autonomic function in healthy individuals. Further adequately powered studies are required to answer open questions remaining from this study. Future studies should investigate effects of different MI types over a longer period, to rule out habituation and assess autonomic function at several time points and simultaneously with MI.

References

Demougeot L, Papaxanthis C . Muscle fatigue affects mental simulation of action. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(29):10712-20. PMC: 6622640. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6032-10.2011. View

Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Skoura X, Schieppati M . Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task. Behav Brain Res. 2002; 134(1-2):209-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00030-x. View

Kleim J . Neural plasticity and neurorehabilitation: teaching the new brain old tricks. J Commun Disord. 2011; 44(5):521-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.04.006. View

Newcombe R . Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998; 17(8):857-72. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::aid-sim777>3.0.co;2-e. View

Boonstra A, de Vries S, Veenstra E, Tepper M, Feenstra W, Otten E . Using the Hand Laterality Judgement Task to assess motor imagery: a study of practice effects in repeated measurements. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012; 35(3):278-80. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328355dd1e. View

Gerardin E, Sirigu A, Lehericy S, Poline J, Gaymard B, Marsault C . Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb Cortex. 2000; 10(11):1093-104. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/10.11.1093. View

OLDFIELD R . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1):97-113. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. View

Altman D, Bland J . Statistics notes. Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?. BMJ. 1999; 318(7192):1209. PMC: 1115595. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7192.1209. View

Decety J, Jeannerod M, Prablanc C . The timing of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res. 1989; 34(1-2):35-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(89)80088-9. View

10.

Oishi K, Maeshima T . Autonomic nervous system activities during motor imagery in elite athletes. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 21(3):170-9. DOI: 10.1097/00004691-200405000-00005. View

11.

Seebacher B, Kuisma R, Glynn A, Berger T . The effect of rhythmic-cued motor imagery on walking, fatigue and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomised controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2016; 23(2):286-296. DOI: 10.1177/1352458516644058. View

12.

Malouin F, Richards C, Durand A, Doyon J . Clinical assessment of motor imagery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22(4):330-40. DOI: 10.1177/1545968307313499. View

13.

Breckenridge J, Ginn K, Wallwork S, McAuley J . Do People With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Have Impaired Motor Imagery? A Meta-analytical Systematic Review of the Left/Right Judgment Task. J Pain. 2018; 20(2):119-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.07.004. View

14.

Schieber M . Mirror neurons: reflecting on the motor cortex and spinal cord. Curr Biol. 2013; 23(4):R151-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.004. View

15.

Kraeutner S, Gionfriddo A, Bardouille T, Boe S . Motor imagery-based brain activity parallels that of motor execution: evidence from magnetic source imaging of cortical oscillations. Brain Res. 2014; 1588:81-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.001. View

16.

Lebon F, Collet C, Guillot A . Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24(6):1680-7. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d8e936. View

17.

Williams L, Braithwaite F, Leake H, McDonnell M, Peto D, Moseley G . Reliability and validity of a mobile tablet for assessing left/right judgements. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019; 40:45-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.01.010. View

18.

Schuster C, Glassel A, Scheidhauer A, Ettlin T, Butler J . Motor imagery experiences and use: asking patients after stroke where, when, what, why, and how they use imagery: a qualitative investigation. Stroke Res Treat. 2012; 2012:503190. PMC: 3347754. DOI: 10.1155/2012/503190. View

19.

Decety J, Jeannerod M . Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery?. Behav Brain Res. 1995; 72(1-2):127-34. DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(96)00141-6. View

20.

Di Rienzo F, Collet C, Hoyek N, Guillot A . Selective effect of physical fatigue on motor imagery accuracy. PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e47207. PMC: 3474822. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047207. View