» Articles » PMID: 34255204

A Practical Approach to Orofacial Rehabilitation in a Patient After Inferior Maxillectomy and Rhinectomy with Mono Framework Construction Supported on a Zygomatic Implant Placed in the Glabella: a Case Report

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Date 2021 Jul 13
PMID 34255204
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In the field of craniofacial tumor surgery, an adequately performed excision, despite being a life-saving procedure, is only a first step to successful treatment. During such a procedure, the main goal is to completely remove the lesion, paying less attention to factors contributing to future rehabilitation possibilities. One ty 2of the possibilities for prosthetic rehabilitation of such cases is utilizing one-piece implants with bicortical anchorage.

Case Presentation: This case report presents a case of a 48-year-old patient with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The treatment protocol consisted of radical surgery to remove the tumor, and intraoral and extraoral rehabilitation with a single framework prosthesis anchored with one-piece implants. Moreover, the intraoral stomatognathic deformity was corrected with a fixed implant-retained prosthesis, and the extraoral defect was covered with a removable epithesis.

Conclusions: The use of one-piece implants with bicortical anchorage may be an additional tool in reconstructing maxillofacial defects. Properly executed treatment may improve the esthetics, speech, masticatory function, muscle support, and the overall quality of life of patients with extensive defects in the maxillofacial region.

Citing Articles

The Latest Craniofacial Reconstructive Techniques Using Anchored Implants after Surgical Treatment of Nasal and Paranasal Sinuses Tumors.

Dzaman K, Ziemska-Gorczyca M, Anurin I, Blaszczyk M Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 37372781 PMC: 10298436. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11121663.


Management of Mandibular Nonunion Fracture with Single-Piece Implant - A Case Report.

Gaur V, Doshi A, Bengani A Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 12(1):95-98.

PMID: 36199469 PMC: 9527847. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_227_21.


Rehabilitation of a Midfacial Defect Using a Two-Piece Maxillofacial Prosthesis: A Case Report.

Vadlamudi C, Bathala L, Tammineedi S, Bandlamudi B, Pshl P Cureus. 2022; 14(2):e22138.

PMID: 35308699 PMC: 8918676. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22138.

References
1.
Krekmanov L . Placement of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants in patients with severe bone deficiency: a clinical report of procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15(5):722-30. View

2.
Austin G, Shockley W . Reconstruction of nasal defects: contemporary approaches. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 24(5):453-60. PMC: 5077171. DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000295. View

3.
Geerts G, Stuhlinger M, Nel D . A comparison of the accuracy of two methods used by pre-doctoral students to measure vertical dimension. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91(1):59-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.016. View

4.
Morgano A . Functional load in oblique bicortical implants: parasinusal implants and palatine implants. J Oral Implantol. 2010; 39(4):467-74. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00121.1. View

5.
Federspil P . Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses for facial defects. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 8:Doc03. PMC: 3199820. DOI: 10.3205/cto000055. View