» Articles » PMID: 34252292

Patterns of Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Young Children Throughout the First 18 Months Following Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 12
PMID 34252292
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To describe sociodemographic and parent psychosocial characteristics associated with patterns of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use across the first 18 months post-type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosis among young children. One hundred fifty-seven parent-child dyads enrolled in a behavioral intervention for parents of young children (1-6 years) newly diagnosed with T1D. Parents reported on baseline sociodemographic characteristics and psychosocial functioning; child CGM use was assessed at five time points during the first 18 months post-diagnosis. Most participants (81.8%) used CGM at least once. Four CGM trajectories emerged ( and . Participants with private insurance were more likely to be in the , , or groups versus the group. Youth in the and groups had lower mean HbA1c at 18 months than those in the group. Given the health benefits of CGM, further exploration of barriers to CGM use in families with public health insurance is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02527525.

Citing Articles

Expansion of Medicaid Coverage of Continuous Glucose Monitor Reduces Health Disparity in Children and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

Miyazaki B, Zeier T, Barber R, Espinoza J, Chao L J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; 19322968241287217.

PMID: 39397768 PMC: 11571635. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241287217.


The impact of socioeconomic factors, social determinants, and ethnicity on the utilization of glucose sensor technology among persons with diabetes mellitus: a narrative review.

Been R, Lameijer A, Gans R, van Beek A, Kingsnorth A, Choudhary P Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2024; 15:20420188241236289.

PMID: 38476216 PMC: 10929059. DOI: 10.1177/20420188241236289.


First STEPS: Primary Outcomes of a Randomized, Stepped-Care Behavioral Clinical Trial for Parents of Young Children With New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes.

Hilliard M, Tully C, Monaghan M, Hildebrandt T, Wang C, Barber J Diabetes Care. 2022; 45(10):2238-2246.

PMID: 35997261 PMC: 9643142. DOI: 10.2337/dc21-2704.


Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Recent Advances in Behavioral Research.

Monaghan M, Bryant B, Inverso H, Moore H, Streisand R Curr Diab Rep. 2022; 22(6):247-256.

PMID: 35435615 PMC: 9013975. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-022-01465-0.

References
1.
Willi S, Miller K, DiMeglio L, Klingensmith G, Simmons J, Tamborlane W . Racial-ethnic disparities in management and outcomes among children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatrics. 2015; 135(3):424-34. PMC: 4533245. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-1774. View

2.
Addala A, Auzanneau M, Miller K, Maier W, Foster N, Kapellen T . A Decade of Disparities in Diabetes Technology Use and HbA in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Transatlantic Comparison. Diabetes Care. 2020; 44(1):133-140. PMC: 8162452. DOI: 10.2337/dc20-0257. View

3.
Markowitz J, Pratt K, Aggarwal J, Volkening L, Laffel L . Psychosocial correlates of continuous glucose monitoring use in youth and adults with type 1 diabetes and parents of youth. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012; 14(6):523-6. PMC: 3359621. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2011.0201. View

4.
Tanenbaum M, Hanes S, Miller K, Naranjo D, Bensen R, Hood K . Diabetes Device Use in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Barriers to Uptake and Potential Intervention Targets. Diabetes Care. 2016; 40(2):181-187. PMC: 5864141. DOI: 10.2337/dc16-1536. View

5.
Pilkonis P, Choi S, Reise S, Stover A, Riley W, Cella D . Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment. 2011; 18(3):263-83. PMC: 3153635. DOI: 10.1177/1073191111411667. View