» Articles » PMID: 34249612

Verification and Clinical Translation of a Newly Designed "Skywalker" Robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Clinical Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Jul 12
PMID 34249612
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate accuracy of an innovative "Skywalker" system, a newly designed, robot-assisted operation system for orthopaedics via a clinical trial at knee joint.

Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of the clinical data of 31 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty assisted by the "Skywalker" robot (Microport, Suzhou, China) from June 2020 to January 2021. Five male patients and 26 female patients aged 69.68 ​± ​6.11 years (range: 57-79 years) were diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and indicated for surgery. The "Skywalker" surgical robotic system was adopted to make a preoperative plan for knee arthroplasty. When the robotic arm reached the specified position during the operation, a single surgeon performed the osteotomy with a cutting saw through the cutting jig, and the difference between the actual and the expected resection thickness, and the preoperative and postoperative lower limb alignments were measured.

Results: The actual error of the resection thickness was the difference between the actual and the expected resection thickness. The absolute error of the resection thickness was the absolute value of the actual error of resection thickness. The absolute errors of the resection thickness of the medial and lateral condyle of the distal femur, the medial and lateral posterior condyle of the femur, and the medial and lateral sides of the tibial plateau were 0.87 ​± ​0.63 ​mm, 1.02 ​± ​0.67 ​mm, 0.74 ​± ​0.46 ​mm, 0.98 ​± ​0.81 ​mm, 0.92 ​± ​0.66 ​mm, and 1.04 ​± ​0.84 ​mm, respectively. The absolute angle errors between the actual postoperative angles and the preoperative planned angles of the lower limb alignment angles, coronal femoral component angles, and coronal tibial component angles were 1.46° ​± ​0.95°, 1.13° ​± ​1.01°, and 1.05° ​± ​0.73°, respectively. Besides, 100% of the absolute error of the HKA angles was within 3°. In addition, compared to the preoperative lower limb alignment angle, 90.32% of the postoperative lower limb alignment angles of 31 patients were closer to 180° after the operation. All 31 patients underwent a successful surgery, and no relevant complications occurred after the operation, such as surgical site infection, deep venous thrombosis, or vascular and nerve injury.

Conclusion: The "Skywalker" system has good osteotomy accuracy, can achieve the planned angles well, and is expected to assist surgeons in performing accurate bone cuts and reconstructing planned lower limb alignments in the relevant clinical applications in future.

Citing Articles

Computer-aided robotics for applications in fracture reduction surgery: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.

Zhou X, Chen Y, Miao G, Guo Y, Zhang Q, Bi J iScience. 2025; 28(1):111509.

PMID: 39811638 PMC: 11732504. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111509.


A newly custom coordinate system used for preoperative planning of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Qiao H, Xia R, Chang Y, Kong K, Jin M, Zhai Z Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40355.

PMID: 39619583 PMC: 11605408. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40355.


Innovative development of robot reduction system in geriatric pelvic fractures: A single-center case series in Beijing, China.

Zhao C, Xiao H, Cao Q, Ge Y, Li Y, Wang Y J Orthop Translat. 2024; 49:283-288.

PMID: 39534853 PMC: 11555238. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.08.023.


Predictive Accuracy Analysis of a Novel Robotic-Assisted System for Total Knee Arthroplasty:A Prospective Observational Study.

Miao H, Zhu Z, Wang H, Bai X, Li X Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024; 20:473-482.

PMID: 39135983 PMC: 11318605. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S468598.


Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Update.

Pipino G, Giai Via A, Ratano M, Spoliti M, Lanzetti R, Oliva F J Pers Med. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38929810 PMC: 11204817. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060589.


References
1.
Jacofsky D, Allen M . Robotics in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(10):2353-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.026. View

2.
McNabb D, Kim R, Springer B . Instability after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2014; 28(2):97-104. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396080. View

3.
Netravali N, Shen F, Park Y, Bargar W . A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2013; 2013:970703. PMC: 3657445. DOI: 10.1155/2013/970703. View

4.
Qin L, Wen J, Chui C, Leung K . Housing design and testing of a surgical robot developed for orthopaedic surgery. J Orthop Translat. 2018; 5:72-80. PMC: 5987043. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2016.02.002. View

5.
Kim S, Park Y, Ha C, Lim S, Moon Y . Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(9):e1334-9. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120822-18. View