» Articles » PMID: 34247224

Two-year Reduction of Dual-energy CT Urate Depositions During a Treat-to-target Strategy in Gout in the NOR-Gout Longitudinal Study

Overview
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2021 Jul 11
PMID 34247224
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: There is a lack of large longitudinal studies of urate deposition measured by dual-energy CT (DECT) during urate lowering therapy (ULT) in people with gout. We explored longitudinal changes in DECT urate depositions during a treat-to-target strategy with ULT in gout.

Methods: Patients with a recent gout flare and serum-urate (sUA) >360 µmol/l attended tight-control visits during escalating ULT. The treatment target was sUA <360 µmol/l, and <300 µmol/l if presence of tophi. A DECT scanner (General Electric Discovery CT750 HD) acquired data from bilateral forefeet and ankles at baseline and after one and two years. Images were scored in known order, using the semi-quantitative Bayat method, by one experienced radiologist who was blinded to serum urate and clinical data. Four regions were scored: the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint, the other joints of the toes, the ankles and midfeet, and all tendons in the feet and ankles.

Results: DECT was measured at baseline in 187 of 211 patients. The mean (s.d.) serum urate level (μmol/l) decreased from 501 (80) at baseline to 311 (48) at 12 months, and 322 (67) at 24 months. DECT scores at all locations decreased during both the first and the second year (P <0.001 for all comparisons vs baseline), both for patients achieving and not achieving the sUA treatment target.

Conclusions: In patients with gout, urate depositions in ankles and feet as measured by DECT decreased both in the first and the second year, when patients were treated using a treat-to-target ULT strategy.

Citing Articles

Advanced imaging techniques in crystal arthritis.

Laurent V, Filippou G, Sirotti S, Pascart T Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2025; 17:1759720X251316097.

PMID: 39906218 PMC: 11792016. DOI: 10.1177/1759720X251316097.


Effective xanthine oxidase inhibitor urate lowering therapy in gout is linked to an emergent serum protein interactome of complement and inflammation modulators.

Sanchez C, Campeau A, Liu-Bryan R, Mikuls T, ODell J, Gonzalez D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24598.

PMID: 39426967 PMC: 11490615. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74154-5.


Effective xanthine oxidase inhibitor urate lowering therapy in gout is linked to an emergent serum protein interactome of complement activation and inflammation modulators.

Sanchez C, Campeau A, Liu-Bryan R, Mikuls T, ODell J, Gonzalez D Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38766125 PMC: 11100878. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4278877/v1.


Sustained xanthine oxidase inhibitor treat to target urate lowering therapy rewires a tight inflammation serum protein interactome.

Sanchez C, Campeau A, Liu-Bryan R, Mikuls T, ODell J, Gonzalez D Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 38260556 PMC: 10802734. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3770277/v1.


Factors influencing the kinetics of MSU crystal depletion measured with dual-energy CT in patients with gout.

Laurent V, Jauffret C, Pacaud A, Ducoulombier V, Legrand J, Verdun S RMD Open. 2023; 9(4).

PMID: 37940341 PMC: 10632919. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003725.


References
1.
Hammer H, Karoliussen L, Terslev L, Haavardsholm E, Kvien T, Uhlig T . Ultrasound shows rapid reduction of crystal depositions during a treat-to-target approach in gout patients: 12-month results from the NOR-Gout study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79(11):1500-1505. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217392. View

2.
Ellmann H, Bayat S, Araujo E, Manger B, Kleyer A, Cavallaro A . Effects of Conventional Uric Acid-Lowering Therapy on Monosodium Urate Crystal Deposits. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 72(1):150-156. DOI: 10.1002/art.41063. View

3.
Dalbeth N, Doyle A . Imaging tools to measure treatment response in gout. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017; 57(suppl_1):i27-i34. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex445. View

4.
Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, Barskova V, Becce F, Castaneda-Sanabria J . 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016; 76(1):29-42. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209707. View

5.
FitzGerald J, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles A . 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72(6):879-895. DOI: 10.1002/art.41247. View