» Articles » PMID: 34246619

Rethinking Autonomous Surgery: Focusing on Enhancement over Autonomy

Overview
Journal Eur Urol Focus
Specialty Urology
Date 2021 Jul 11
PMID 34246619
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: As robot-assisted surgery is increasingly used in surgical care, the engineering research effort towards surgical automation has also increased significantly. Automation promises to enhance surgical outcomes, offload mundane or repetitive tasks, and improve workflow. However, we must ask an important question: should autonomous surgery be our long-term goal?

Objective: To provide an overview of the engineering requirements for automating control systems, summarize technical challenges in automated robotic surgery, and review sensing and modeling techniques to capture real-time human behaviors for integration into the robotic control loop for enhanced shared or collaborative control.

Evidence Acquisition: We performed a nonsystematic search of the English language literature up to March 25, 2021. We included original studies related to automation in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery and human-centered sensing and modeling.

Evidence Synthesis: We identified four comprehensive review papers that present techniques for automating portions of surgical tasks. Sixteen studies relate to human-centered sensing technologies and 23 to computer vision and/or advanced artificial intelligence or machine learning methods for skill assessment. Twenty-two studies evaluate or review the role of haptic or adaptive guidance during some learning task, with only a few applied to robotic surgery. Finally, only three studies discuss the role of some form of training in patient outcomes and none evaluated the effects of full or semi-autonomy on patient outcomes.

Conclusions: Rather than focusing on autonomy, which eliminates the surgeon from the loop, research centered on more fully understanding the surgeon's behaviors, goals, and limitations could facilitate a superior class of collaborative surgical robots that could be more effective and intelligent than automation alone.

Patient Summary: We reviewed the literature for studies on automation in surgical robotics and on modeling of human behavior in human-machine interaction. The main application is to enhance the ability of surgical robotic systems to collaborate more effectively and intelligently with human surgeon operators.

Citing Articles

Robotic Assistance in Percutaneous Liver Ablation Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Uribe Rivera A, Seeliger B, Goffin L, Garcia-Vazquez A, Mutter D, Gimenez M Ann Surg Open. 2024; 5(2):e406.

PMID: 38911657 PMC: 11191991. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000406.


A surgical activity model of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for co-operation with collaborative robots.

Younis R, Yamlahi A, Bodenstedt S, Scheikl P, Kisilenko A, Daum M Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(8):4316-4328.

PMID: 38872018 PMC: 11289174. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10958-w.


Configurations of human-centered AI at work: seven actor-structure engagements in organizations.

Wilkens U, Lupp D, Langholf V Front Artif Intell. 2023; 6:1272159.

PMID: 38028670 PMC: 10664146. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2023.1272159.


In the Hands of a Robot, From the Operating Room to the Courtroom: The Medicolegal Considerations of Robotic Surgery.

Pai S, Jeyaraman M, Jeyaraman N, Nallakumarasamy A, Yadav S Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e43634.

PMID: 37719624 PMC: 10504870. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43634.


Recognition and Prediction of Surgical Gestures and Trajectories Using Transformer Models in Robot-Assisted Surgery.

Shi C, Zheng Y, Fey A Rep U S. 2023; 2022:8017-8024.

PMID: 37363719 PMC: 10288529. DOI: 10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9981611.


References
1.
Judkins T, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N . Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks. Surg Endosc. 2008; 23(3):590-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9933-9. View

2.
Carbonara U, Simone G, Minervini A, Sundaram C, Larcher A, Lee J . Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: A multicenter analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 47(5):1179-1186. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.012. View

3.
Dulan G, Rege R, Hogg D, Gilberg-Fisher K, Arain N, Tesfay S . Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26(6):1516-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2102-6. View

4.
Ward T, Mascagni P, Ban Y, Rosman G, Padoy N, Meireles O . Computer vision in surgery. Surgery. 2020; 169(5):1253-1256. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.10.039. View

5.
Lee D, Yu H, Kwon H, Kong H, Lee K, Kim H . Evaluation of Surgical Skills during Robotic Surgery by Deep Learning-Based Multiple Surgical Instrument Tracking in Training and Actual Operations. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(6). PMC: 7355689. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061964. View