» Articles » PMID: 34239299

Long-Term Benefits of Adding a Pedometer to Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COPD: The Randomized Controlled STAR Trial

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2021 Jul 9
PMID 34239299
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This Stay Active after Rehabilitation (STAR) study examined the effects of a pedometer-based behavioral intervention for individuals with COPD during three weeks of inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on patients' physical activity levels six weeks and six months after PR, including steps (primary outcome), moderate-intensity physical activity, and sedentary time as well as patient quality of life, symptoms, and other psychological and clinical variables.

Patients And Methods: Rehabilitation patients with COPD wore a triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph wGT3X) for seven days two weeks before (T0) as well as six weeks (T3) and six months (T4) after PR. In addition to the three-week inpatient PR (control group, CG), the randomly allocated intervention group (IG) received a brief pedometer-based behavioral intervention with the application of the following behavior-change techniques: performing the behavior, individual goal-setting, self-monitoring, and feedback. The effects were analyzed using analysis of covariance with an intention-to-treat approach.

Results: A total of 327 patients (69% male, age: 58 years, FEV (%): 53.5, six-minute walk distance: 447.8 m) were randomly allocated to either the IG (n = 167) or CG (n = 160). Although both groups increased their daily steps after PR (IG: M = 1152, CG: M = 745; IG: M = 795, CG: M = 300), the slightly higher increases in daily steps in the IG compared to the CG at T3 (Δ388 steps, = 0.16) and T4 (Δ458 steps, = 0.15) were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 for all). Patients in both groups showed moderate to high pre-post-changes in terms of secondary outcomes, but no advantage favoring the IG was found.

Conclusion: The results show that adding a pedometer-based behavioral intervention to standard German three-week inpatient PR for COPD patients did not result in more physical activity in terms of steps and moderate-intensity physical activity or less sedentary time. However, both groups (IG and CG) showed remarkably enhanced physical activity levels six weeks and six months after PR, as well as improvements in other secondary outcomes (eg, quality of life).

Citing Articles

Nudge theories and strategies influencing adult health behaviors and outcomes in COPD management: a systematic review.

Wu Q, Zhang R, Tao L, Cai W, Cao X, Mao Z Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1404590.

PMID: 39564365 PMC: 11573774. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1404590.


Changes in physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep following pulmonary rehabilitation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Manifield J, Chaudhry Y, Singh S, Ward T, Whelan M, Orme M Eur Respir Rev. 2024; 33(172).

PMID: 38599676 PMC: 11004771. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0225-2023.


Wearable technology interventions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shah A, Althobiani M, Saigal A, Ogbonnaya C, Hurst J, Mandal S NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):222.

PMID: 38012218 PMC: 10682416. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00962-0.


Sustaining training effects through physical activity coaching (STEP): a randomized controlled trial.

Loeckx M, Rodrigues F, Blondeel A, Everaerts S, Janssens W, Demeyer H Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):121.

PMID: 37814266 PMC: 10563200. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01519-w.


Role of digital health in pulmonary rehabilitation and beyond: shaping the future.

Pimenta S, Hansen H, Demeyer H, Slevin P, Cruz J ERJ Open Res. 2023; 9(2).

PMID: 36923569 PMC: 10009701. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00212-2022.


References
1.
Busby A, Reese R, Simon S . Pulmonary rehabilitation maintenance interventions: a systematic review. Am J Health Behav. 2014; 38(3):321-30. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.38.3.1. View

2.
Vogelmeier C, Criner G, Martinez F, Anzueto A, Barnes P, Bourbeau J . Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report: GOLD Executive Summary. Eur Respir J. 2017; 49(3). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00214-2017. View

3.
Van Remoortel H, Raste Y, Louvaris Z, Giavedoni S, Burtin C, Langer D . Validity of six activity monitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison with indirect calorimetry. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e39198. PMC: 3380044. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039198. View

4.
Barker J, Smith Byrne K, Doherty A, Foster C, Rahimi K, Ramakrishnan R . Physical activity of UK adults with chronic disease: cross-sectional analysis of accelerometer-measured physical activity in 96 706 UK Biobank participants. Int J Epidemiol. 2019; 48(4):1167-1174. PMC: 6693885. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy294. View

5.
Zwerink M, van der Palen J, van der Valk P, Brusse-Keizer M, Effing T . Relationship between daily physical activity and exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2012; 107(2):242-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.09.018. View