» Articles » PMID: 34238116

Identification of Key Genes Involved in the Recurrence of Glioblastoma Multiforme Using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis and Differential Expression Analysis

Overview
Journal Bioengineered
Date 2021 Jul 9
PMID 34238116
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most fatal malignancy, and despite extensive treatment, tumors inevitably recur. This study aimed to identify recurrence-associated molecules in GBM. The gene expression profile GSE139533, containing 70 primary and 47 recurrent GBM tissues and their corresponding clinical traits, was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and used for weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis. After identifying the hub genes which differentially expressed in recurrent GBM tissues and in the gene modules correlated with recurrence, data from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CCGA) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases were analyzed with GSE43378 to determine the relationship between hub genes and patient prognosis. The diagnostic value of the identified hub genes was verified using 52 GBM tissues. Three gene modules were correlated with recurrence and 2623 genes were clustered in these clinically significant modules. Among these, 13 genes - and - were differentially expressed in recurrent GBM samples; low and expression predicted poor outcomes. and expression showed weak positive relationships with Karnofsky performance scale scores. Additionally, and expression was found to be decreased in our recurrent GBM samples compared with that in primary samples; these genes exhibited high diagnostic value in distinguishing recurrent samples from primary samples. Our findings indicate that and might be involved in GBM recurrence and act as potential biomarkers for this condition.

Citing Articles

Immune-Related Molecules and : Novel Biomarkers Associated with Sepsis.

Li N, Ren P, Wang J, Zhu X, Qiao X, Zeng Z Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(2).

PMID: 38255822 PMC: 10815248. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25020749.


Identification of FXYD6 as the novel biomarker for glioma based on differential expression and DNA methylation.

Hou W, Cai J, Shen P, Zhang S, Xiao S, You P Cancer Med. 2023; 12(24):22170-22184.

PMID: 38093622 PMC: 10757084. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6752.


Anti-atherosclerosis mechanisms associated with regulation of non-coding RNAs by active monomers of traditional Chinese medicine.

Liu G, Tan L, Zhao X, Wang M, Zhang Z, Zhang J Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1283494.

PMID: 38026969 PMC: 10657887. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1283494.


Long Non-coding RNA Prader Willi/Angelman Region RNA 6 Suppresses Glioma Development by Modulating MicroRNA-106a-5p.

E Y, Zhang X, Ma H, Dong F Biochem Genet. 2023; 62(2):1365-1378.

PMID: 37610693 DOI: 10.1007/s10528-023-10479-6.


Bioinformatics analysis based on crucial genes of endothelial cells in rheumatoid.

Zhou X, Wu L Front Genet. 2023; 14:1143644.

PMID: 37091794 PMC: 10117816. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1143644.


References
1.
Lenti E, Farinello D, Yokoyama K, Penkov D, Castagnaro L, Lavorgna G . Transcription factor TLX1 controls retinoic acid signaling to ensure spleen development. J Clin Invest. 2016; 126(7):2452-64. PMC: 4922703. DOI: 10.1172/JCI82956. View

2.
Navarria P, Ascolese A, Tomatis S, Reggiori G, Clerici E, Villa E . Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A New Challenge. Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 48(1):37-44. PMC: 4720100. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.259. View

3.
Wan Q, Tang J, Han Y, Wang D . Co-expression modules construction by WGCNA and identify potential prognostic markers of uveal melanoma. Exp Eye Res. 2017; 166:13-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.10.007. View

4.
Vengoji R, Macha M, Nimmakayala R, Rachagani S, Siddiqui J, Mallya K . Afatinib and Temozolomide combination inhibits tumorigenesis by targeting EGFRvIII-cMet signaling in glioblastoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 38(1):266. PMC: 6582495. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-019-1264-2. View

5.
Andreiuolo F, Puget S, Peyre M, Dantas-Barbosa C, Boddaert N, Philippe C . Neuronal differentiation distinguishes supratentorial and infratentorial childhood ependymomas. Neuro Oncol. 2010; 12(11):1126-34. PMC: 3098029. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq074. View