Association of Short and Long Interpregnancy Intervals with Adverse Birth Outcomes: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in Northwest China

Patients And Methods: A stratified multistage random sampling method was used to recruit participants who gave birth between 2010 and 2013 in Shaanxi province. A self-designed questionnaire was used to collect the information of the participants. With the confounding factors controlled, the generalized linear model (GLM) was used to investigate the association between IPI and neonatal birth outcomes. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) function was used to evaluate the dose-response relationship between IPI and birth outcomes.

Results: A total of 13,231 women were included. The prevalence of LBW, SGA, PTB, and birth defects was 3.24%, 12.96%, 2.93%, and 2.12%, respectively. GLM showed that a short IPI (<6 months) was associated with a higher risk of SGA (RR=1.25, 95% CI: 1.04-1.52) and birth defects (RR=2.55, 95% CI: 1.45-4.47), and a long IPI (≥120 months) was associated with a higher risk of LBW (RR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.01-2.34) and PTB (RR=1.73, 95% CI: 1.08-2.76) than an IPI of 18-23 months. The RCS showed that LBW, SGA, and PTB demonstrated a j-shaped relationship with IPI (P for overall association < 0.001 for these three birth outcomes), and birth defects (P for overall association <0.001) had an inversely non-linear relationship with IPI.

Conclusion: Both short and long IPIs are associated with an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes.

Citing Articles

The association between interpregnancy intervals and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wen X, Liang W, Zhai J, Wang Y, Zheng P, Wang S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):226.

PMID: 40022000 PMC: 11871605. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07259-y.

Prevalence of short inter-birth intervals and associated factors among women of reproductive age: evidence from a nationally representative survey in Tanzania.

Minja J, Rweyemamu L, Joho A, Moshi F, Shamba D, Mbotwa C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):185.

PMID: 39972442 PMC: 11841273. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07026-5.

Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes according to maternal age in the context of China's two-child policy.

Xiu S, Tang L, Qin C, Tian D, Chen Y, Gu L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):81.

PMID: 39871180 PMC: 11770942. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07136-8.

Short interbirth interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a Bayesian network approach.

Heisecke S, Campana H, Santos M, Lopez Camelo J, Rittler M AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(4):100406.

PMID: 39507463 PMC: 11539572. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100406.

Effects of short inter-pregnancy/birth interval on adverse perinatal outcomes in Asia-Pacific region: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hassen T, Harris M, Shifti D, Beyene T, Khan M, Feyissa T PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307942.

PMID: 39083535 PMC: 11290688. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307942.

References

Harris B, Bishop K, Kemeny H, Walker J, Rhee E, Kuller J . Risk Factors for Birth Defects. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017; 72(2):123-135. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000405. View

Zeng Y, Hesketh T . The effects of China's universal two-child policy. Lancet. 2016; 388(10054):1930-1938. PMC: 5944611. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31405-2. View

Guo L, Qu P, Zhang R, Zhao D, Wang H, Liu R . Propensity Score-Matched Analysis on the Association Between Pregnancy Infections and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Rural Northwestern China. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):5154. PMC: 5979963. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23306-5. View

Lonhart J, Mayo J, Padula A, Wise P, Stevenson D, Shaw G . Short interpregnancy interval as a risk factor for preterm birth in non-Hispanic Black and White women in California. J Perinatol. 2019; 39(9):1175-1181. PMC: 6713584. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-019-0402-1. View

Gebremedhin A, Regan A, Ball S, Betran A, Foo D, Gissler M . Effect of interpregnancy interval on gestational diabetes: a retrospective matched cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2019; 39:33-38.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.09.004. View

Qu P, Li S, Liu D, Lei F, Zeng L, Wang D . A propensity-matched study of the association between optimal folic acid supplementation and birth defects in Shaanxi province, Northwestern China. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):5271. PMC: 6437303. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41584-5. View

Marinovich M, Regan A, Gissler M, Magnus M, Haberg S, Padula A . Developing evidence-based recommendations for optimal interpregnancy intervals in high-income countries: protocol for an international cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(1):e027941. PMC: 6352763. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027941. View

Lin J, Liu H, Wu D, Hu H, Wang H, Zhou C . Long interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. Sci China Life Sci. 2019; 63(6):898-904. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-018-9593-8. View

Hanley G, Hutcheon J, Kinniburgh B, Lee L . Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129(3):408-415. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891. View

10.

Shachar B, Lyell D . Interpregnancy interval and obstetrical complications. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012; 67(9):584-96. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31826b2c3e. View

11.

Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan J, Norton M, Rosas-Bermudez A . Effect of the interpregnancy interval on perinatal outcomes in Latin America. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106(2):359-66. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171118.79529.a3. View

12.

Gebremedhin A, Regan A, Ball S, Betran A, Foo D, Gissler M . Interpregnancy interval and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A population-based cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020; 35(4):404-414. DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12668. View

13.

Rutstein S . Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under-five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 89 Suppl 1:S7-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.012. View

14.

Schummers L, Hutcheon J, Hernandez-Diaz S, Williams P, Hacker M, VanderWeele T . Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval With Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age. JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178(12):1661-1670. PMC: 6583597. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696. View

15.

Zhu B . Effect of interpregnancy interval on birth outcomes: findings from three recent US studies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 89 Suppl 1:S25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.08.002. View

16.

Finer L, Zolna M . Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(9):843-52. PMC: 4861155. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575. View

17.

Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard M, Chou D, Moller A, Narwal R . National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. 2012; 379(9832):2162-72. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4. View

18.

Yang J, Cheng Y, Pei L, Jiang Y, Lei F, Zeng L . Maternal iron intake during pregnancy and birth outcomes: a cross-sectional study in Northwest China. Br J Nutr. 2017; 117(6):862-871. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114517000691. View

19.

Walani S . Global burden of preterm birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 150(1):31-33. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13195. View

20.

Gluckman P, Hanson M, Cooper C, Thornburg K . Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(1):61-73. PMC: 3923653. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra0708473. View