» Articles » PMID: 34232830

Modeling Bystander Effects That Cause Growth Delay of Breast Cancer Xenografts in Bone Marrow of Mice Treated with Radium-223

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2021 Jul 7
PMID 34232830
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: The role of radiation-induced bystander effects in cancer therapy with alpha-particle emitting radiopharmaceuticals remains unclear. With renewed interest in using alpha-particle emitters to sterilize disseminated tumor cells, micrometastases, and tumors, a better understanding of the direct effects of alpha particles and the contribution of the bystander responses they induce is needed to refine dosimetric models that help predict clinical benefit. Accordingly, this work models and quantifies the relative importance of direct effects (DE) and bystander effects (BE) in the growth delay of human breast cancer xenografts observed previously in the tibiae of mice treated with RaCl.

Methods: A computational model of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 human breast cancer xenografts in the tibial bone marrow of mice administered RaCl was created. A Monte Carlo radiation transport simulation was performed to assess individual cell absorbed doses. The responses of the breast cancer cells to direct alpha particle irradiation and gamma irradiation were needed as input data for the model and were determined experimentally using a colony-forming assay and compared to the responses of preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 and osteocyte-like MLO-Y4 bone cells. Using these data, a scheme was devised to simulate the dynamic proliferation of the tumors , including DE and BE propagated from the irradiated cells. The parameters of the scheme were estimated semi-empirically to fit experimental tumor growth.

Results: A robust BE component, in addition to a much smaller DE component, was required to simulate the tumor proliferation. We also found that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for cell killing by alpha particle radiation was greater for the bone cells than the tumor cells.

Conclusion: This modeling study demonstrates that DE of radiation alone cannot explain experimental observations of RaCl-induced growth delay of human breast cancer xenografts. Furthermore, while the mechanisms underlying BE remain unclear, the addition of a BE component to the model is necessary to provide an accurate prediction of the growth delay. More complex models are needed to further comprehend the extent and complexity of RaCl-induced BE.

Citing Articles

Immunological effects of radiopharmaceutical therapy.

Shea A, Idrissou M, Torres A, Chen T, Hernandez R, Morris Z Front Nucl Med. 2024; 4:1331364.

PMID: 39355211 PMC: 11440989. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2024.1331364.


DNA damage response in a 2D-culture model by diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy (Alpha-DaRT).

Nojima H, Kaida A, Matsuya Y, Uo M, Yoshimura R, Arazi L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11468.

PMID: 38769339 PMC: 11106084. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62071-6.


Estimation of relative biological effectiveness of Ac compared to Lu during [Ac]Ac-PSMA and [Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy using TOPAS/TOPAS-nBio/MEDRAS.

Rumiantcev M, Li W, Lindner S, Liubchenko G, Resch S, Bartenstein P EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):53.

PMID: 37695374 PMC: 10495309. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00567-2.


Heterogeneity of dose distribution in normal tissues in case of radiopharmaceutical therapy with alpha-emitting radionuclides.

Li W, Bouvier-Capely C, Vargas C, Andersson M, Madas B Radiat Environ Biophys. 2022; 61(4):579-596.

PMID: 36239799 PMC: 9630198. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-01000-5.


Differential responses to Ra and Alpha-particles exposure in prostate cancer driven by mitotic catastrophe.

Guerra Liberal F, Moreira H, Redmond K, OSullivan J, Alshehri A, Wright T Front Oncol. 2022; 12:877302.

PMID: 35965568 PMC: 9367686. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.877302.


References
1.
Rajon D, Bolch W, Howell R . Lognormal distribution of cellular uptake of radioactivity: Monte Carlo simulation of irradiation and cell killing in 3-dimensional populations in carbon scaffolds. J Nucl Med. 2011; 52(6):926-33. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.080044. View

2.
Liu X, Sun C, Jin X, Li P, Ye F, Zhao T . Genistein enhances the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells via G₂/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Molecules. 2013; 18(11):13200-17. PMC: 6269669. DOI: 10.3390/molecules181113200. View

3.
Pinto G, B Bonifacio D, de Sa L, Lima L, Vieira I, Lopes R . A cell-based dosimetry model for radium-223 dichloride therapy using bone micro-CT images and GATE simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2020; 65(4):045010. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab6b42. View

4.
He F, Bai J, Wang J, Zhai J, Tong L, Zhu G . Irradiation-induced osteocyte damage promotes HMGB1-mediated osteoclastogenesis in vitro. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234(10):17314-17325. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.28351. View

5.
Sun Q, Liu T, Yuan Y, Guo Z, Xie G, Du S . MiR-200c inhibits autophagy and enhances radiosensitivity in breast cancer cells by targeting UBQLN1. Int J Cancer. 2014; 136(5):1003-12. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29065. View