» Articles » PMID: 34232254

Association of Mitral Annular Disjunction With Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients With Marfan Syndrome

Overview
Journal JAMA Cardiol
Date 2021 Jul 7
PMID 34232254
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) has received particular interest in patients with mitral valve prolapse, ventricular tachycardia, and sudden cardiac death. The clinical significance of MAD for patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) remains largely unexplored.

Objective: To define the prevalence of MAD and examine its association with cardiovascular outcomes and arrhythmia among patients with MFS.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 142 patients with a diagnosis of MFS based on the revised Ghent criteria and a confirmed (likely) pathogenic variant in the FBN1 gene who underwent regular follow-up between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The presence of MAD was assessed by echocardiography, and the extent of MAD was categorized in tertiles. Patients also underwent resting electrocardiography and 24-hour Holter monitoring. Outcomes included aortic events (aortic dissection or prophylactic aortic surgery), arrhythmic events (defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia or sudden cardiac death), and mitral valve surgery.

Results: A total of 142 patients (72 female patients [51%]; median age at first examination, 25 years [range, 2-64 years]) were evaluated. Forty-eight patients (34%) had MAD. Patients with MAD had larger aortic root z scores than patients without MAD (4.1 [interquartile range, 2.8-5.7] vs 3.0 [interquartile range, 1.8-4.0]; P < .001) and more often had mitral valve prolapse (34 of 48 [71%] vs 14 of 94 [15%]; P < .001), ventricular ectopy (14 of 33 [42%] vs 15 of 70 [21%]; P = .03), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (13 of 33 [39%] vs 12 of 70 [17%]; P = .01). During follow-up, aortic events occurred at similar rates among patients with vs without MAD (15 of 43 [35%] vs 21 of 84 [25%]; P = .24), but patients in the upper MAD tertile (>10 mm) showed a higher occurrence of aortic events compared with patients with MAD of 10 mm or smaller (9 of 15 [60%] vs 6 of 28 [21%]; P = .01). Patients with arrhythmic events (n = 5) and patients requiring mitral valve surgery (n = 7) were observed exclusively in the group displaying MAD.

Conclusions And Relevance: This study suggests that MAD among patients with MFS is associated with the occurrence of arrhythmic events, a higher need for mitral valve intervention, and, among patients with extensive MAD, more aortic events. Cardiac imaging for patients with MFS should consider the assessment of MAD as a potential marker for adverse outcomes.

Citing Articles

Advances in Cardiovascular Multimodality Imaging in Patients with Marfan Syndrome.

Perrone M, Moscatelli S, Guglielmi G, Bianco F, Cappelletti D, Pellizzon A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39857055 PMC: 11763472. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020172.


Assessment of Myocardial Fibrosis in Marfan Syndrome Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Demolder A, Devos D, De Backer J, Muino-Mosquera L Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024; 12(11):e70024.

PMID: 39548726 PMC: 11568239. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.70024.


Mitral Annular Disjunction Associated with Ventricular Dilation in Pediatric Marfan Syndrome: A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study.

Bishop R, Doan T, Craik N, Stephens S, Chavez A, Sachdeva S Pediatr Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39465402 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-024-03678-4.


Echocardiographic Assessment of Mitral Valve Prolapse Prevalence before and after the Year 1999: A Systematic Review.

Sonaglioni A, Nicolosi G, Bruno A, Lombardo M, Muti P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458110 PMC: 11508471. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206160.


Genotype-Mitral Valve Phenotype Correlations in Marfan Syndrome With Pathogenic Variants.

Delhomme C, Milleron O, Arnoult F, Delorme G, Eliahou L, Jadoui S JACC Adv. 2024; 1(5):100149.

PMID: 38939454 PMC: 11198402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100149.


References
1.
Taub C, Stoler J, Perez-Sanz T, Chu J, Isselbacher E, Picard M . Mitral valve prolapse in Marfan syndrome: an old topic revisited. Echocardiography. 2008; 26(4):357-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00825.x. View

2.
Lang R, Badano L, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L . Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 16(3):233-70. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev014. View

3.
Campens L, Demulier L, De Groote K, Vandekerckhove K, De Wolf D, Roman M . Reference values for echocardiographic assessment of the diameter of the aortic root and ascending aorta spanning all age categories. Am J Cardiol. 2014; 114(6):914-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.06.024. View

4.
von Kodolitsch Y, De Backer J, Schuler H, Bannas P, Behzadi C, Bernhardt A . Perspectives on the revised Ghent criteria for the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome. Appl Clin Genet. 2015; 8:137-55. PMC: 4476478. DOI: 10.2147/TACG.S60472. View

5.
von Kodolitsch Y, Demolder A, Girdauskas E, Kaemmerer H, Kornhuber K, Mosquera L . Features of Marfan syndrome not listed in the Ghent nosology - the dark side of the disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2019; 17(12):883-915. DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2019.1704625. View