» Articles » PMID: 34226776

War Against COVID-19: How Is National Identification Linked With the Adoption of Disease-Preventive Behaviors in China and the United States?

Overview
Journal Polit Psychol
Date 2021 Jul 6
PMID 34226776
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fighting the COVID-19 pandemic requires large numbers of citizens to adopt disease-preventive practices. We contend that national identification can mobilize and motivate people to engage in preventive behaviors to protect the collective, which in return would heighten national identification further. To test these reciprocal links, we conducted studies in two countries with diverse national tactics toward curbing the pandemic: (1) a two-wave longitudinal survey in China (Study 1,  = 1200), where a national goal to fight COVID-19 was clearly set, and (2) a five-wave longitudinal survey in the United States (Study 2,  = 1001), where the national leader, President Trump, rejected the severity of COVID-19 in its early stage. Results revealed that national identification was associated with an increase in disease-preventive behaviors in both countries in general. However, higher national identification was associated with greater trust in Trump's administration among politically conservative American participants, which then was associated with slower adoption of preventive behaviors. The reciprocal effect of disease-preventive behaviors on national identification was observed only in China. Overall, our findings suggest that although national identification may serve as a protective factor in curbing the pandemic, this beneficial effect was reduced in some political contexts.

Citing Articles

Policy Endorsement and Booster Shot: Exploring Politicized Determinants for Acceptance of a Third Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine in China.

Zhang R, Yan J, Jia H, Luo X, Liu Q, Lin J Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36851298 PMC: 9962357. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020421.


Do we need a strong captain to navigate the COVID-19 pandemic? Social identification, conspiracy theory beliefs, and the wish for a strong leader.

Moscatelli S, Graziani A, Botindari L, Ciaffoni S, Menegatti M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1100519.

PMID: 36844345 PMC: 9945967. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1100519.


Not "My" crisis: Social identity and followers' crisis responses to COVID-19.

Lau V, Tse D, Bligh M, Hong Y, Kakarika M, Chan H Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2022; .

PMID: 35942362 PMC: 9349868. DOI: 10.1111/asap.12316.


Two-Tailed Dogs, Social Unrest and COVID-19 Vaccination: Politics, Hesitancy and Vaccine Choice in Hungary and Thailand.

Goodwin R, Nguyen Luu L, Wiwattanapantuwong J, Kovacs M, Suttiwan P, Levin Y Vaccines (Basel). 2022; 10(5).

PMID: 35632545 PMC: 9147869. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10050789.


Double standards in the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderation of perceived threat.

Wang X, Wang T, Jiang T, Chen Z, Hong Y Eur J Soc Psychol. 2022; 52(3):515-527.

PMID: 35463056 PMC: 9015595. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2834.


References
1.
Yamey G, Gonsalves G . Donald Trump: a political determinant of covid-19. BMJ. 2020; 369:m1643. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1643. View

2.
Levine M, Crowther S . The responsive bystander: how social group membership and group size can encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008; 95(6):1429-39. DOI: 10.1037/a0012634. View

3.
Gaffney A, Sherburne B, Hackett J, Rast 3rd D, Hohman Z . The transformative and informative nature of elections: Representation, schism, and exit. Br J Soc Psychol. 2018; 58(1):88-104. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12279. View

4.
Vignoles V, Jaser Z, Taylor F, Ntontis E . Harnessing Shared Identities to Mobilize Resilient Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Polit Psychol. 2021; 42(5):817-826. PMC: 8013210. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12726. View

5.
Sibley C, Greaves L, Satherley N, Wilson M, Overall N, Lee C . Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2020; 75(5):618-630. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000662. View