» Articles » PMID: 34223311

"Drones Are a Great Idea! What is an AED?" Novel Insights from a Qualitative Study on Public Perception of Using Drones to Deliver Automatic External Defibrillators

Overview
Journal Resusc Plus
Date 2021 Jul 5
PMID 34223311
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The quickest way to ensure survival in an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is for a bystander to provide immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and apply an automated external defibrillator (AED). The urgency of OHCA treatment has led to the proposal of alternative avenues for better access to AEDs, particularly in rural settings. More recently, using unmanned aerial vehicles (or drones) to deliver AEDs to rural OHCA sites has proven promising in improving survival rates.

Objective: A pilot drone AED delivery program is currently being piloted in the community of Caledon, Ontario. The purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of public perception and acceptance of the use of drones for this purpose and to identify tailored community engagement strategies to ensure successful uptake.

Methods: In-depth qualitative descriptive study using interviews and focus group data collection and inductive thematic analysis. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 67 community members (40 interviews; 2 focus groups of 15) at existing community events in the project area. Interview guides were used to ensure consistency across data collection events. Detailed field notes were recorded when audio-recording was not possible.

Results: The central message seen throughout the data was quickly identified as the potential impact of low levels of CPR and AED literacy in the community over anything else including concerns about the drone. The impact of the community's existing relationship with the EMS; the need for bystander CPR & AED promotion prior to the program launch; and the value the community places on transparency and accountability related to the research and the drones were also key findings. In general, the drone concept was found to be acceptable but concerns about providing CPR and using the AED was what created anxieties in the lay public that we underestimated.

Conclusion: Drone-delivered AEDs may be feasible and effective but successful uptake in smaller communities will require a deep understanding of a community's cardiac arrest literacy levels, information needs and readiness for innovation. This work will inform a robust community engagement plan that will be scalable to other locations considering a drone AED program.

Citing Articles

Flight testing of drone-delivered automated external defibrillators for simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in suburban Thailand.

Srivilaithon W, Khunkhlai N, Currie M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6936.

PMID: 40011628 PMC: 11865582. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91924-x.


Drones delivering automated external defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review.

Jakobsen L, Kjaerulf V, Bray J, Olasveengen T, Folke F Resusc Plus. 2025; 21():100841.

PMID: 39811468 PMC: 11730569. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100841.


Using drones to improve care for HIV-exposed children in Conakry, Republic of Guinea: Anthropological perspectives.

Laborde-Balen G, Diallo O, Cisse M, Koita Y, Taverne B, Inghels M PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(11):e0003445.

PMID: 39602371 PMC: 11602074. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003445.


Out of hospital cardiac arrest, first steps to know and follow in Mexico to have cardioprotected territories. A point of view of a group of experts.

de la Cadena-Sillas J, Asensio-Lafuente E, Martinez-Dunker D, Urzua-Gonzalez A, Celaya-Cota M, Aguilera-Mora L Arch Cardiol Mex. 2024; 94(2):174-180.

PMID: 38306447 PMC: 11160541. DOI: 10.24875/ACM.23000072.


Unmanned aerial vehicles and pre-hospital emergency medicine.

Surman K, Lockey D Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024; 32(1):9.

PMID: 38287437 PMC: 10826110. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-024-01180-7.


References
1.
Francis J, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles M . What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010; 25(10):1229-45. DOI: 10.1080/08870440903194015. View

2.
Balasingam M . Drones in medicine-The rise of the machines. Int J Clin Pract. 2017; 71(9). DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12989. View

3.
Shalowitz M, Isacco A, Barquin N, Clark-Kauffman E, Delger P, Nelson D . Community-based participatory research: a review of the literature with strategies for community engagement. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009; 30(4):350-61. DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181b0ef14. View

4.
Yingling L, Brooks A, Wallen G, Peters-Lawrence M, McClurkin M, Cooper-McCann R . Community Engagement to Optimize the Use of Web-Based and Wearable Technology in a Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment Study: A Mixed Methods Approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016; 4(2):e38. PMC: 4861844. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.4489. View

5.
King K, Kolopack P, Merritt M, Lavery J . Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research. BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15:84. PMC: 4290104. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-84. View