» Articles » PMID: 34223287

Portable Single-lead Electrocardiogram Device is Accurate for QTc Evaluation in Hospitalized Patients

Overview
Journal Heart Rhythm O2
Date 2021 Jul 5
PMID 34223287
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many commonly used drugs can prolong the QTc interval (QTc), which can lead to potentially life-threatening arrhythmias. In the current era of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is worth mentioning that the disease itself and several drugs used for its treatment have been associated with QTc prolongation.

Objective: To evaluate the agreement and clinical precision of a portable single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) device to measure the QTc interval compared to the standard 12-lead ECG.

Methods: In sequential tests, QTc of ECG recordings obtained with the KardiaMobile (KM-1L) device (AliveCor, San Francisco, CA) were compared to QTc obtained with conventional 12-lead ECG. Agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots and Lin's concordance coefficient. Consistency between the 2 devices in determining QTc prolongation (QTc ≥470 ms in males or ≥480 ms in females) was evaluated with kappa statistics.

Results: A total of 128 patients with a presumed or confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to a university hospital were included. QTc intervals measured with KM-1L were similar to QTc measured with conventional ECG (442.45 ± 40.5 vs 441.65 ± 40.3 ms, = .15). Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant difference in QTc values (average difference of -0.797, 95% limits of agreement:-13.179; 11.585). Lin's concordance coefficient showed an excellent agreement (0.988,  < .001). Concordance between the 2 devices for determining QTc prolongation was excellent (kappa >0.90).

Conclusion: ECG recordings obtained with KM-1L allow an accurate QTc interval assessment. Considering its simplicity of use, this approach has advantages over conventional ECG and can provide an alternative for the evaluation of QTc in hospitalized patients, during the current time of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Citing Articles

Screening for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Based on 12 Leads of the Electrocardiogram-Applicable in Clinical Practice?-Critical Literature Review with Meta-Analysis.

Makowska A, Ananthakrishnan G, Christ M, Dehmer M Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(4).

PMID: 39997283 PMC: 11855451. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13040408.


Development of Prediction Model for Intensive Care Unit Admission Based on Heart Rate Variability: A Case-Control Matched Analysis.

Choi D, Lee H, Joo H, Kong H, Lee S, Kim S Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 38667462 PMC: 11049103. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14080816.


Use of portable single-lead electrocardiogram device as an alternative for QTc monitoring in critically ill patients.

Rebolledo-Del Toro M, Carvajalino-Galeano A, Pinto-Brito C, Munoz-Velandia O, Garcia-Pena A Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2024; 29(3):e13116.

PMID: 38627955 PMC: 11021801. DOI: 10.1111/anec.13116.


Smart devices to measure and monitor QT intervals.

Hoek L, Brouwer J, Voors A, Maass A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1172666.

PMID: 38089772 PMC: 10711087. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1172666.