» Articles » PMID: 34222612

Long-term Outcome Following Percutaneous Intervention of Intra-stent Coronary Occlusion and Evaluating the Different Treatment Modalities

Abstract

Background: Angioplasty for ISR remains a challenge with relatively high rates of recurrence. Although there is a plethora of data on ISR, there is relatively less data on intra-stent-CTO. In this study, we explore the long-term clinical outcomes following angioplasty to intra-stent CTO and study the differences in clinical outcomes between three treatment-arms: POBA vs. DES vs. DCB.

Methods And Results: We evaluated all patients who underwent PCI to intra-stent CTO between 2011 and 2017. The endpoints used were: cardiac-death, TVMI, TLR, TVR, and MACE.During the study period, 403-patients with a mean age of 69.2 years had successful PCI to intra-stent CTO. 50% were diabetic, 38% had CKD and 32% had left ventricular dysfunction. 93% of cases were stable angina. 22% (n = 88) received only POBA, 28% (n = 113) received DCB and 50% (n = 202) received DES. During the median follow-up of 48-months, cardiac-death occurred in 5.8% (n = 23), TVMI in 4% (n = 16), TLR in 45.6% (n = 182), TVR in 48.7% (n = 194) and MACE of 46%. There were no differences in the hard endpoints between the 3treatment arms. However, the TLR and overall MACE were better in DCB and DES-groups as compared to POBA (TLR: 33%vs.42%vs.49%; p = 0.06); MACE (34% vs. 45% vs. 52%; p = 0.05).

Conclusion: This is the first study that has focussed on the outcomes following angioplasty to intra-stent CTOs with a very long-term follow-up. The hard endpoints were low, although the TLR rates were high. In regards to treatment strategy, the DCB and DES provide relatively better outcomes than POBA.

Citing Articles

Increased long non-coding RNA NORAD reflects serious cardiovascular stenosis, aggravated inflammation status, and higher lipid level in coronary heart disease.

Zhang X, Kan X, Shen J, Li J J Clin Lab Anal. 2022; 36(11):e24717.

PMID: 36319574 PMC: 9701832. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24717.


Clinical Outcome of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Treatment of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent In-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion.

Zhang Y, Wu Z, Wang S, Liu T, Liu J Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022; 37(6):1155-1166.

PMID: 35930211 PMC: 10721670. DOI: 10.1007/s10557-022-07363-7.

References
1.
Latib A, Mussardo M, Ielasi A, Tarsia G, Godino C, Al-Lamee R . Long-term outcomes after the percutaneous treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4(2):155-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.027. View

2.
Zocca P, Kok M, Tandjung K, Danse P, Jessurun G, Hautvast R . 5-Year Outcome Following Randomized Treatment of All-Comers With Zotarolimus-Eluting Resolute Integrity and Everolimus-Eluting PROMUS Element Coronary Stents: Final Report of the DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11(5):462-469. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.11.031. View

3.
Christopoulos G, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, Lombardi W, Grantham J, Rangan B . The efficacy of "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis: insights from a US multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 84(4):646-51. PMC: 4148463. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25465. View

4.
Giacoppo D, Alfonso F, Xu B, Claessen B, Adriaenssens T, Jensen C . Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Stent Restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75(21):2664-2678. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.006. View

5.
Stone G, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller J, Williams J . Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary.... Circulation. 2009; 119(5):680-6. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.803528. View