» Articles » PMID: 34222490

Robotic Applications in Orthodontics: Changing the Face of Contemporary Clinical Care

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Jul 5
PMID 34222490
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The last decade (2010-2021) has witnessed the evolution of robotic applications in orthodontics. This review scopes and analyzes published orthodontic literature in eight different domains: (1) robotic dental assistants; (2) robotics in diagnosis and simulation of orthodontic problems; (3) robotics in orthodontic patient education, teaching, and training; (4) wire bending and customized appliance robotics; (5) nanorobots/microrobots for acceleration of tooth movement and for remote monitoring; (6) robotics in maxillofacial surgeries and implant placement; (7) automated aligner production robotics; and (8) TMD rehabilitative robotics. A total of 1,150 records were searched, of which 124 potentially relevant articles were retrieved in full. 87 studies met the selection criteria following screening and were included in the scoping review. The review found that studies pertaining to arch wire bending and customized appliance robots, simulative robots for diagnosis, and surgical robots have been important areas of research in the last decade (32%, 22%, and 16%). Rehabilitative robots and nanorobots are quite promising and have been considerably reported in the orthodontic literature (13%, 9%). On the other hand, assistive robots, automated aligner production robots, and patient robots need more scientific data to be gathered in the future (1%, 1%, and 6%). Technological readiness of different robotic applications in orthodontics was further assessed. The presented eight domains of robotic technologies were assigned to an estimated technological readiness level according to the information given in the publications. Wire bending robots, TMD robots, nanorobots, and aligner production robots have reached the highest levels of technological readiness: 9; diagnostic robots and patient robots reached level 7, whereas surgical robots and assistive robots reached lower levels of readiness: 4 and 3, respectively.

Citing Articles

Clinical audit of an artificial intelligence (AI) empowered smile simulation system: a prospective clinical trial.

Adel S, Bichu Y, Pandian S, Sabouni W, Shah C, Vaiid N Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19385.

PMID: 39169095 PMC: 11339289. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69314-6.


Revolutionizing Smiles: Advancing Orthodontics Through Digital Innovation.

Pandey R, Kamble R, Kanani H Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e64086.

PMID: 39114257 PMC: 11305434. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64086.


Minimally Invasive Approaches in Orthognathic Surgery: A Narrative Review of Contemporary Techniques and their Clinical Outcomes.

Altwaijri A J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 2):S1652-S1656.

PMID: 38882864 PMC: 11174174. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1226_23.


Application of Robotics in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review.

De la Garza-Ramos M, Ipina-Lozano H, Cano-Verdugo G, Nakagoshi-Cepeda M, Liu Y Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58555.

PMID: 38765377 PMC: 11102082. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58555.


The effectiveness of chitosan as a hemostatic in dentistry in patients with antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Minervini G, Franco R, Marrapodi M, Di Blasio M, Cicciu M, Ronsivalle V BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):70.

PMID: 38200485 PMC: 10782677. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03568-w.


References
1.
Spin-Neto R, Mudrak J, Matzen L, Christensen J, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A . Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 42(2):32310645. PMC: 3699011. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/32310645. View

2.
Kirshenblatt S, Chen H, Dieltjens M, Pliska B, Almeida F . Adherence to Treatment with Removable Oral Appliances: the Past and the Future. J Can Dent Assoc. 2019; 84:i3. View

3.
Schott T, Ludwig B, Glasl B, Lisson J . A microsensor for monitoring removable-appliance wear. J Clin Orthod. 2011; 45(9):518-20. View

4.
Young S, Dyson M . The effect of therapeutic ultrasound on angiogenesis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990; 16(3):261-9. DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(90)90005-w. View

5.
Bi X, Zhao F . [Application of artificial intelligence in stomatology treatment and nursing]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018; 36(4):452-456. PMC: 7048260. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2018.04.018. View