» Articles » PMID: 34220918

Glyphosate-Based Herbicides Alter the Reproductive Morphology of (Prickly Rose)

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2021 Jul 5
PMID 34220918
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum herbicide that is widely used in many different commercial formulations. Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) are used in forestry operations to reduce populations of plants that compete with merchantable conifers. Past research has found that low-dose GBH applications caused male sterility in agriculturally relevant plants, sparking a need to determine the potential impacts of forestry-related GBH applications on understory plants. We investigated the effects of GBH on the reproductive morphology of , a highly prevalent understory shrub within British Columbia, Canada, growing on three operational forestry cutblocks treated with 1.782 kg a.i./ha of glyphosate, in the Omineca Region, and also in a controlled experiment. We analyzed floral and pollen morphology from treated plants and compared these with untreated plants in both scenarios. Pollen viability of treated plants was reduced by an average of 66%, and >30% of anthers were non-dehiscent compared to controls across our three field sites and experimental plants. We also found alterations in pollen and petal morphology in flowers from treated sites and glyphosate residues present in floral tissues 2 years after GBH applications. It is important to fully understand how long GBH-induced change will impact forest vegetation, to preserve natural forest biodiversity and reduce anthropogenic influences on boreal forest ecosystems.

Citing Articles

The effect of herbicides on morphological features of pollen grains in Prunus serotina Ehrh. in the context of elimination of this invasive species from European forests.

Wronska-Pilarek D, Maciejewska-Rutkowska I, Lechowicz K, Bocianowski J, Hauke-Kowalska M, Baranowska M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4657.

PMID: 36949138 PMC: 10033914. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31010-2.


Glyphosate Pollution Treatment and Microbial Degradation Alternatives, a Review.

Castrejon-Godinez M, Tovar-Sanchez E, Valencia-Cuevas L, Rosas-Ramirez M, Rodriguez A, Mussali-Galante P Microorganisms. 2021; 9(11).

PMID: 34835448 PMC: 8625783. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9112322.

References
1.
Zabalza A, Orcaray L, Fernandez-Escalada M, Zulet-Gonzalez A, Royuela M . The pattern of shikimate pathway and phenylpropanoids after inhibition by glyphosate or quinate feeding in pea roots. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2017; 141:96-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2016.12.005. View

2.
Watson J, Evans T, Venter O, Williams B, Tulloch A, Stewart C . The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018; 2(4):599-610. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x. View

3.
Cederlund H . Effects of spray drift of glyphosate on nontarget terrestrial plants-A critical review. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017; 36(11):2879-2886. DOI: 10.1002/etc.3925. View

4.
Mori S, Fukui H, Oishi M, Sakuma M, Kawakami M, Tsukioka J . Biocommunication between Plants and Pollinating Insects through Fluorescence of Pollen and Anthers. J Chem Ecol. 2018; 44(6):591-600. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-018-0958-9. View

5.
Boutin C, STRANDBERG B, Carpenter D, Mathiassen S, Thomas P . Herbicide impact on non-target plant reproduction: what are the toxicological and ecological implications?. Environ Pollut. 2013; 185:295-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.009. View