» Articles » PMID: 34211317

Physiological Responses and Predictors of Performance in a Simulated Competitive Ski Mountaineering Race

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Jul 2
PMID 34211317
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Competitive ski mountaineering (SKIMO) has achieved great popularity within the past years. However, knowledge about the predictors of performance and physiological response to SKIMO racing is limited. Therefore, 21 male SKIMO athletes split into two performance groups (elite: VO 71.2 ± 6.8 ml· min· kg vs. sub-elite: 62.5 ± 4.7 ml· min· kg) were tested and analysed during a vertical SKIMO race simulation (523 m elevation gain) and in a laboratory SKIMO specific ramp test. In both cases, oxygen consumption (VO), heart rate (HR), blood lactate and cycle characteristics were measured. During the race simulation, the elite athletes were approximately 5 min faster compared with the sub-elite (27:15 ± 1:16 min; 32:31 ± 2:13 min; p < 0.001). VO was higher for elite athletes during the race simulation (p = 0.046) and in the laboratory test at ventilatory threshold 2 (p = 0.005) and at maximum VO (p = 0.003). Laboratory maximum power output is displayed as treadmill speed and was higher for elite than sub-elite athletes (7.4 ± 0.3 km h; 6.6 ± 0.3 km h; p < 0.001). Lactate values were higher in the laboratory maximum ramp test than in the race simulation (p < 0.001). Pearson's correlation coefficient between race time and performance parameters was highest for velocity and VO related parameters during the laboratory test (r > 0.6). Elite athletes showed their superiority in the race simulation as well as during the maximum ramp test. While HR analysis revealed a similar strain to both cohorts in both tests, the superiority can be explainable by higher VO and power output. To further push the performance of SKIMO athletes, the development of named factors like power output at maximum and ventilatory threshold 2 seems crucial.

Citing Articles

Sex differences in elite ski mountaineering aerobic performance.

Schorderet F, Mottet J, Lathion A, Raberin A, Bourdillon N, Millet G Front Sports Act Living. 2025; 7:1534315.

PMID: 40017814 PMC: 11865187. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1534315.


Global research trends in skiing from 1974 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis.

Hou W, Li X, Wen Y, Du X Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e35471.

PMID: 39170295 PMC: 11336741. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35471.


Heel riser height and slope gradient influence the physiology of ski mountaineering-A laboratory study.

Lasshofer M, Seifert J, Worndle A, Stoggl T Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1159728.

PMID: 37153216 PMC: 10154589. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1159728.


Left Ventricular, Left Atrial and Right Ventricular Strain Modifications after Maximal Exercise in Elite Ski-Mountaineering Athletes: A Feasibility Speckle Tracking Study.

Zimmermann P, Eckstein M, Moser O, Schoffl I, Zimmermann L, Schoffl V Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(20).

PMID: 36293734 PMC: 9603167. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013153.


Heel riser height and slope gradient influence the kinematics and kinetics of ski mountaineering-A laboratory study.

Lasshofer M, Seifert J, Worndle A, Stoggl T Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:886025.

PMID: 36060627 PMC: 9433713. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.886025.


References
1.
Wilhite D, Mickleborough T, Laymon A, Chapman R . Increases in .VO2max with "live high-train low" altitude training: role of ventilatory acclimatization. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012; 113(2):419-26. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-012-2443-4. View

2.
Lucia A, Hoyos J, Perez M, Chicharro J . Heart rate and performance parameters in elite cyclists: a longitudinal study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(10):1777-82. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200010000-00018. View

3.
Mognoni P, Rossi G, Gastaldelli F, Canclini A, Cotelli F . Heart rate profiles and energy cost of locomotion during cross-country skiing races. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001; 85(1-2):62-7. DOI: 10.1007/s004210100432. View

4.
Lindinger S, Holmberg H . How do elite cross-country skiers adapt to different double poling frequencies at low to high speeds?. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 111(6):1103-19. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1736-8. View

5.
Gellaerts J, Bogdanov E, Dadashi F, Mariani B . In-Field Validation of an Inertial Sensor-Based System for Movement Analysis and Classification in Ski Mountaineering. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(3). PMC: 5876535. DOI: 10.3390/s18030885. View