» Articles » PMID: 34208815

Continuous Intravenous Administration of Granulocyte-Colony-Stimulating Factors-A Breakthrough in the Treatment of Cancer Patients with Febrile Neutropenia

Abstract

(1) Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) remains one of the most challenging problems in medical oncology and is a very severe side effect of chemotherapy. Its late consequences, when it is recurrent or of a severe grade, are dose reduction and therapy delays. Current guidelines allow the administration of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) for profound FN (except for the case when a pegylated form of G-CSF is administrated with prophylactic intention) in addition to antibiotics and supportive care. (2) Methods: This is a prospective study that included 96 patients with confirmed malignancy, treated with chemotherapy, who developed FN during their oncological therapy, and were hospitalized. They received standard treatment plus a dose of G-CSF of 16 µg/Kg/day IV continuous infusion. (3) Results: The gender distribution was almost symmetrical: Male patients made up 48.96% and 51.04% were female patients, with no significance on recovery from FN ( = 1.00). The patients who received prophylactic G-CSF made up 20.21%, but this was not a predictive or prognostic factor for the recovery time from aplasia ( = 0.34). The median chemotherapy line where patients with FN were included was two and the number of previous chemotherapy cycles before FN was three. The median serological number of neutrophils (PMN) was 450/mm and leucocytes (WBC) 1875/mm at the time of FN. Ten patients possess PMN less than 100/mm. The median time to recovery was 25.5 h for 96 included patients, with one failure in which the patient possessed grade 5 FN. Predictive factors for shorter recovery time were lower levels of C reactive protein ( < 0.001) and procalcitonin ( = 0.002) upon hospital admission and higher WBC ( = 0.006) and PMN ( < 0.001) at the time of the provoking cycle of chemotherapy for FN. The best chance for a shorter duration of FN was a short history of chemotherapy regarding the number of cycles) ( < 0.0001). (4) Conclusions: Continuous IV administration of G-CSF could be an alternative salvage treatment for patients with profound febrile neutropenia, with a very fast recovery time for neutrophiles.

Citing Articles

The reliability of FEbrile Neutropenia after ChEmotherapy (FENCE) scores in predicting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor breakthrough febrile neutropenia among patients with lymphoma undergoing first-cycle chemotherapy: A prospective....

Thungthong P, Chamnanchanunt S, Suwanban T, Nakhahes C, Iam-Arunthai K, Akrawikrai T Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1122282.

PMID: 36993799 PMC: 10040561. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1122282.


Granulocyte colony stimulating factor use and adherence to clinical practice guidelines among women with breast cancer living in Puerto Rico: a population-based study.

Jimenez Nieves Y, Ortiz-Ortiz K, Rios Motta R, Castaneda-Avila M, Tortolero-Luna G BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):935.

PMID: 35858914 PMC: 9299407. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08325-3.

References
1.
Bronchud M, Potter M, Morgenstern G, Blasco M, Scarffe J, Thatcher N . In vitro and in vivo analysis of the effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients. Br J Cancer. 1988; 58(1):64-9. PMC: 2246501. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1988.163. View

2.
Garcia-Carbonero R, Mayordomo J, Tornamira M, Lopez-Brea M, Rueda A, Guillem V . Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenia: a multicenter randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93(1):31-8. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/93.1.31. View

3.
Watts M, Addison I, Long S, Hartley S, Warrington S, Boyce M . Crossover study of the haematological effects and pharmacokinetics of glycosylated and non-glycosylated G-CSF in healthy volunteers. Br J Haematol. 1997; 98(2):474-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.2393053.x. View

4.
Scholz M, Schirm S, Wetzler M, Engel C, Loeffler M . Pharmacokinetic and -dynamic modelling of G-CSF derivatives in humans. Theor Biol Med Model. 2012; 9:32. PMC: 3507764. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4682-9-32. View

5.
Seicean A, Gheorghiu M, Zaharia T, Calinici T, Samarghitan A, Marcus B . Performance of the Standard 22G Needle for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Tissue Core Biopsy in Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016; 25(2):213-8. DOI: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.252.ugg. View