» Articles » PMID: 34206557

Ultrasonographic and Histological Correlation After Experimental Reconstruction of a Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury with Adipose Tissue

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jul 2
PMID 34206557
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different types of scaffolds are used to reconstruct muscle volume loss injuries. In this experimental study, we correlated ultrasound observations with histological findings in a muscle volume loss injury reconstructed with autologous adipose tissue. The outcome is compared with decellularized and porous matrix implants. Autologous adipose tissue, decellularized matrix, and a porous collagen matrix were implanted in volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries generated on the anterior tibial muscles of Wistar rats. Sixty days after implantation, ultrasound findings were compared with histological and histomorphometric analysis. The muscles with an autologous adipose tissue implant exhibited an ultrasound pattern that was quite similar to that of the regenerative control muscles. From a histological point of view, the defects had been occupied by newly formed muscle tissue with certain structural abnormalities that would explain the differences between the ultrasound patterns of the normal control muscles and the regenerated ones. While the decellularized muscle matrix implant resulted in fibrosis and an inflammatory response, the porous collagen matrix implant was replaced by regenerative muscle fibers with neurogenic atrophy and fibrosis. In both cases, the ultrasound images reflected echogenic, echotextural, and vascular changes compatible with the histological findings of failed muscle regeneration. The ultrasound analysis confirmed the histological findings observed in the VML injuries reconstructed by autologous adipose tissue implantation. Ultrasound can be a useful tool for evaluating the structure of muscles reconstructed through tissue engineering.

Citing Articles

Basic research for ultrasound-guided injection into skeletal muscle lesions in an experimental animal model.

Fujimoto K, Kanamoto T, Otani S, Miyazaki R, Ebina K, Nakata K Bone Joint Res. 2025; 14(1):33-41.

PMID: 39819782 PMC: 11739951. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.141.BJR-2024-0090.R1.


The Diagnostic Value of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in the Quantitative Evaluation of Skeletal Muscle in Chronic Thyrotoxic Myopathy: A Single-Center Study in China.

Wang R, Fu S, Huang R, Qiu C, Tang Y, Liu Y Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:3541-3554.

PMID: 39170733 PMC: 11338175. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S472442.


Acute and chronic mammary periprosthetic histological changes of the muscle.

Camara-Perez J, Jimena I, Rodriguez-Cano M, Sanz-Zorrilla A, Osuna-Soto J, Sanchez-Ramirez I JPRAS Open. 2024; 41:265-275.

PMID: 39170095 PMC: 11338051. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.06.010.


Muscle Research: A Tour d'Horizon.

Zancanaro C Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(3).

PMID: 35163508 PMC: 8835776. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031585.

References
1.
Bierinx A, Sebille A . Mouse sectioned muscle regenerates following auto-grafting with muscle fragments: a new muscle precursor cells transfer?. Neurosci Lett. 2008; 431(3):211-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.052. View

2.
Sikdar S, Diao G, Turo D, Stanley C, Sharma A, Chambliss A . Quantification of Muscle Tissue Properties by Modeling the Statistics of Ultrasound Image Intensities Using a Mixture of Gamma Distributions in Children With and Without Cerebral Palsy. J Ultrasound Med. 2018; 37(9):2157-2169. PMC: 6102099. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14566. View

3.
Kwak H, Han Y, Lee S, Kim K, Chung G . Diagnosis and follow-up US evaluation of ruptures of the medial head of the gastrocnemius ("tennis leg"). Korean J Radiol. 2006; 7(3):193-8. PMC: 2667601. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2006.7.3.193. View

4.
Greising S, Corona B, McGann C, Frankum J, Warren G . Therapeutic Approaches for Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019; 25(6):510-525. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2019.0207. View

5.
Simon N, Noto Y, Zaidman C . Skeletal muscle imaging in neuromuscular disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2016; 33:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.041. View