» Articles » PMID: 34202085

Computational Modeling of Spinal Locomotor Circuitry in the Age of Molecular Genetics

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jul 2
PMID 34202085
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neuronal circuits in the spinal cord are essential for the control of locomotion. They integrate supraspinal commands and afferent feedback signals to produce coordinated rhythmic muscle activations necessary for stable locomotion. For several decades, computational modeling has complemented experimental studies by providing a mechanistic rationale for experimental observations and by deriving experimentally testable predictions. This symbiotic relationship between experimental and computational approaches has resulted in numerous fundamental insights. With recent advances in molecular and genetic methods, it has become possible to manipulate specific constituent elements of the spinal circuitry and relate them to locomotor behavior. This has led to computational modeling studies investigating mechanisms at the level of genetically defined neuronal populations and their interactions. We review literature on the spinal locomotor circuitry from a computational perspective. By reviewing examples leading up to and in the age of molecular genetics, we demonstrate the importance of computational modeling and its interactions with experiments. Moving forward, neuromechanical models with neuronal circuitry modeled at the level of genetically defined neuronal populations will be required to further unravel the mechanisms by which neuronal interactions lead to locomotor behavior.

Citing Articles

Episodic rhythmicity is generated by a distributed neural network in the developing mammalian spinal cord.

Milla-Cruz J, Lognon A, Tran M, Di Vito S, Loer C, Shonak A iScience. 2025; 28(3):111971.

PMID: 40060907 PMC: 11889695. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111971.


The spinal premotor network driving scratching flexor and extensor alternation.

Yao M, Nagamori A, Azim E, Sharpee T, Goulding M, Golomb D bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39829804 PMC: 11741273. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.08.631866.


Sensory feedback and central neuronal interactions in mouse locomotion.

Molkov Y, Yu G, Ausborn J, Bouvier J, Danner S, Rybak I R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(8):240207.

PMID: 39169962 PMC: 11335407. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240207.


Sensory Feedback and Central Neuronal Interactions in Mouse Locomotion.

Molkov Y, Yu G, Ausborn J, Bouvier J, Danner S, Rybak I bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37961258 PMC: 10634960. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.31.564886.


Spinal control of locomotion before and after spinal cord injury.

Danner S, Shepard C, Hainline C, Shevtsova N, Rybak I, Magnuson D Exp Neurol. 2023; 368:114496.

PMID: 37499972 PMC: 10529867. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114496.


References
1.
Zhong G, Shevtsova N, Rybak I, Harris-Warrick R . Neuronal activity in the isolated mouse spinal cord during spontaneous deletions in fictive locomotion: insights into locomotor central pattern generator organization. J Physiol. 2012; 590(19):4735-59. PMC: 3487034. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.240895. View

2.
Satterlie R, Norekian T, Pirtle T . Serotonin-induced spike narrowing in a locomotor pattern generator permits increases in cycle frequency during accelerations. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 83(4):2163-70. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2163. View

3.
Fujiki S, Aoi S, Tsuchiya K, Danner S, Rybak I, Yanagihara D . Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:1288. PMC: 6896512. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01288. View

4.
Hill A, Masino M, Calabrese R . Intersegmental coordination of rhythmic motor patterns. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 90(2):531-8. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00338.2003. View

5.
Yakovenko S, Gritsenko V, Prochazka A . Contribution of stretch reflexes to locomotor control: a modeling study. Biol Cybern. 2004; 90(2):146-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-003-0449-z. View