» Articles » PMID: 34200309

Mutagenic Consequences of Sublethal Cell Death Signaling

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jul 2
PMID 34200309
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many human cancers exhibit defects in key DNA damage response elements that can render tumors insensitive to the cell death-promoting properties of DNA-damaging therapies. Using agents that directly induce apoptosis by targeting apoptotic components, rather than relying on DNA damage to indirectly stimulate apoptosis of cancer cells, may overcome classical blocks exploited by cancer cells to evade apoptotic cell death. However, there is increasing evidence that cells surviving sublethal exposure to classical apoptotic signaling may recover with newly acquired genomic changes which may have oncogenic potential, and so could theoretically spur the development of subsequent cancers in cured patients. Encouragingly, cells surviving sublethal necroptotic signaling did not acquire mutations, suggesting that necroptosis-inducing anti-cancer drugs may be less likely to trigger therapy-related cancers. We are yet to develop effective direct inducers of other cell death pathways, and as such, data regarding the consequences of cells surviving sublethal stimulation of those pathways are still emerging. This review details the currently known mutagenic consequences of cells surviving different cell death signaling pathways, with implications for potential oncogenic transformation. Understanding the mechanisms of mutagenesis associated (or not) with various cell death pathways will guide us in the development of future therapeutics to minimize therapy-related side effects associated with DNA damage.

Citing Articles

Cell death: Revisiting the roads to ruin.

Green D Dev Cell. 2024; 59(19):2523-2531.

PMID: 39378838 PMC: 11469552. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.08.008.


Ellagic Acid and Cancer Hallmarks: Insights from Experimental Evidence.

cizmarikova M, Michalkova R, Mirossay L, Mojzisova G, Zigova M, Bardelcikova A Biomolecules. 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38002335 PMC: 10669545. DOI: 10.3390/biom13111653.


Haloperidol's Cytogenetic Effect on T Lymphocytes of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: An In Vitro Study.

Demirtzoglou G, Chrysoglou S, Iakovidou-Kritsi Z, Lambropoulos A, Garyfallos A Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e42283.

PMID: 37609095 PMC: 10440589. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42283.


Pattern Recognition Receptors of Nucleic Acids Can Cause Sublethal Activation of the Mitochondrial Apoptosis Pathway during Viral Infection.

Gradzka-Boberda S, Gentle I, Hacker G J Virol. 2022; 96(18):e0121222.

PMID: 36069553 PMC: 9517702. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01212-22.


Spontaneous activity of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway drives chromosomal defects, the appearance of micronuclei and cancer metastasis through the Caspase-Activated DNAse.

Haimovici A, Hofer C, Badr M, Haghighi E, Amer T, Boerries M Cell Death Dis. 2022; 13(4):315.

PMID: 35393399 PMC: 8990075. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-04768-y.


References
1.
Han C, Liu Y, Dai R, Ismail N, Su W, Li B . Ferroptosis and Its Potential Role in Human Diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11:239. PMC: 7090218. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00239. View

2.
Xu Y, Ma H, Fang Y, Zhang Z, Shao J, Hong M . Cisplatin-induced necroptosis in TNFα dependent and independent pathways. Cell Signal. 2017; 31:112-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.01.004. View

3.
Potapova T, Gorbsky G . The Consequences of Chromosome Segregation Errors in Mitosis and Meiosis. Biology (Basel). 2017; 6(1). PMC: 5372005. DOI: 10.3390/biology6010012. View

4.
Ganten T, Haas T, Sykora J, Stahl H, Sprick M, Fas S . Enhanced caspase-8 recruitment to and activation at the DISC is critical for sensitisation of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by chemotherapeutic drugs. Cell Death Differ. 2004; 11 Suppl 1:S86-96. DOI: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401437. View

5.
Mistry A, Felix C, Whitmarsh R, Mason A, Reiter A, Cassinat B . DNA topoisomerase II in therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(15):1529-38. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa042715. View