» Articles » PMID: 34194610

Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Certainties and Controversies

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 Jul 1
PMID 34194610
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently a well-recognized entity, characterized by some specific anatomic, biological and conditional features: It includes patients with a stage of disease intermediate between the resectable and the locally advanced ones. The term BR identifies a tumour with an aggressive biological behaviour, on which a neoadjuvant approach instead of an upfront surgery one should be preferred, in order to obtain a radical resection (R0) and to avoid an early recurrence after surgery. Even if during the last decades several studies on this topic have been published, some aspects of BR-PDAC still represent a matter of debate. The aim of this review is to critically analyse the available literature on this topic, particularly focusing on: The problem of the heterogeneity of definition of BR-PDAC adopted, leading to a misinterpretation of published data; its current management (neoadjuvant upfront surgery); which neoadjuvant regimen should be preferably adopted; the problem of radiological restaging and the determination of resectability after neoadjuvant therapy; the post-operative outcomes after surgery; and the role and efficacy of adjuvant treatment for resected patients that already underwent neoadjuvant therapy.

Citing Articles

Building on the clinical applicability of ctDNA analysis in non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Labiano I, Huerta A, Alsina M, Arasanz H, Castro N, Mendaza S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16203.

PMID: 39003322 PMC: 11246447. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67235-y.


First jejunal vein, jejunal trunk, and pancreatico-duodenectomy: resolving the literature conundrum.

Desai G, Wagle P Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):104.

PMID: 36826524 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02849-w.


Editorial: Neoadjuvant treatment for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Massani M, Stecca T Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1138587.

PMID: 36798820 PMC: 9928151. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1138587.


Is it justified to assess the resectability of pancreatic cancer combined with biological and conditional factors?.

Huang B, Geng H, Jin Y, Zhang X, Qian H, Ye D Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 11(10):3458-3470.

PMID: 36388054 PMC: 9641078. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-1258.


Pancreatic cancer, radiomics and artificial intelligence.

Marti-Bonmati L, Cerda-Alberich L, Perez-Girbes A, Beveridge R, Oron E, Perez Rojas J Br J Radiol. 2022; 95(1137):20220072.

PMID: 35687700 PMC: 10996946. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220072.

References
1.
Kato Y, Yamada S, Tashiro M, Sonohara F, Takami H, Hayashi M . Biological and conditional factors should be included when defining criteria for resectability for patients with pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2019; 21(9):1211-1218. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.012. View

2.
Lind P, Isaksson B, Almstrom M, Johnsson A, Albiin N, Bystrom P . Efficacy of preoperative radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2007; 47(3):413-20. DOI: 10.1080/02841860701592384. View

3.
Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y . FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(19):1817-25. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923. View

4.
Saito K, Isayama H, Sakamoto Y, Nakai Y, Ishigaki K, Tanaka M . A phase II trial of gemcitabine, S-1 and LV combination (GSL) neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Med Oncol. 2018; 35(7):100. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1158-8. View

5.
Akita H, Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, Tomokuni A, Kobayashi S, Sugimura K . FDG-PET predicts treatment efficacy and surgical outcome of pre-operative chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43(6):1061-1067. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.03.015. View