» Articles » PMID: 34193983

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Alzheimer's Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Eye (Lond)
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Jul 1
PMID 34193983
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To assess the association between optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) retinal measurements and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception up to October 28th, 2020 for studies assessing the association between OCTA retinal measurements and AD. Estimates from eligible studies were meta-analysed and pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) between AD patients and healthy participants with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated, using the Hartung-Knapp/Sidik-Jonkman random-effects method. In addition, we quantified the minimum strength on the risk ratio scale (E value) required for an unmeasured confounder to nullify these associations.

Results: Ten eligible studies for our systematic review were identified through our search strategy. The pooled SMD between the retinal vessel density of AD patients and healthy participants in the whole superficial vascular plexus (SVP), parafoveal SVP and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was -0.41 (95% CI: -0.69 to -0.13, p value = 0.01, I = 15%, seven studies), -0.51 (95% CI: -0.84 to -0.18, p value = 0.01, I = 40%, six studies), and 0.87 (95% CI: -0.03 to 1.76, p value = 0.05, I = 91%, seven studies), respectively. An unmeasured confounder would need to be associated with a 2.26-, 2.56- and 3.82-fold increase in the risk of AD and OCTA retinal measurements, in order for the pooled SMD estimate of vessel density in whole SVP, parafoveal SVP and FAZ, respectively, to be nullified.

Conclusions: In our study, whole and parafoveal SVP vessel density were inversely associated with AD. However, prospective longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are needed to furtherly assess these associations.

Citing Articles

Optical attenuation coefficient decorrelation-based optical coherence tomography angiography for microvascular evaluation of Alzheimer's disease on mice.

Xiang B, Ding N, Jiang H, Liu J, Yu Y, Luan J Neurophotonics. 2025; 12(1):015013.

PMID: 40078532 PMC: 11899147. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.12.1.015013.


Retinal vasculometry associations with cognition status in UK Biobank.

Shakespeare R, Rudnicka A, Welikala R, Barman S, Khawaja A, Foster P Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025; 17(1):e270087.

PMID: 39996031 PMC: 11848343. DOI: 10.1002/dad2.70087.


Retinal Microstructural and Microvascular Changes in Alzheimer Disease: A Review.

Olivares Ordonez M, Smith R, Yiu G, Liu Y Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2024; 65(1):59-67.

PMID: 39710907 PMC: 11817161. DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000549.


Early detection of dementia through retinal imaging and trustworthy AI.

Hao J, Kwapong W, Shen T, Fu H, Xu Y, Lu Q NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):294.

PMID: 39428420 PMC: 11491446. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01292-5.


Identification of diabetic retinopathy classification using machine learning algorithms on clinical data and optical coherence tomography angiography.

Li X, Wen X, Shang X, Liu J, Zhang L, Cui Y Eye (Lond). 2024; 38(14):2813-2821.

PMID: 38871934 PMC: 11427469. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03173-3.


References
1.
Veroniki A, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W, Bender R, Bowden J, Knapp G . Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 7(1):55-79. PMC: 4950030. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1164. View

2.
Tsokolas G, Tsaousis K, Diakonis V, Matsou A, Tyradellis S . Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Review. Eye Brain. 2020; 12:73-87. PMC: 7368556. DOI: 10.2147/EB.S193026. View

3.
Jellinger K . Alzheimer disease and cerebrovascular pathology: an update. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2002; 109(5-6):813-36. DOI: 10.1007/s007020200068. View

4.
London A, Benhar I, Schwartz M . The retina as a window to the brain-from eye research to CNS disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012; 9(1):44-53. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.227. View

5.
Mathur M, VanderWeele T . Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in Meta-Analyses. J Am Stat Assoc. 2020; 115(529):163-172. PMC: 7518377. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1529598. View