» Articles » PMID: 34193930

Mechanical Strength and Hydrostatic Testing of VIVO Adhesive in Sutureless Microsurgical Anastomoses: an Ex Vivo Study

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jul 1
PMID 34193930
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional anastomoses with interrupted sutures are challenging and inevitably associated with trauma to the vessel walls. The goal of this study was to evaluate a novel alternative adhesive-based suture-free anastomosis technique that uses an intraluminal stent. Overall, 120 porcine coronary vessels were analyzed in an ex vivo model and were examined for their mechanical (n = 20 per cohort) and hydrostatic strength (n = 20 per cohort). Anastomoses were made using the novel VIVO adhesive with an additional intraluminal nitinol stent and was compared to interrupted suture anastomosis and to native vessels. Sutureless anastomoses withstood pressures 299 ± 4.47 [mmHg] comparable to native vessels. They were performed significantly faster 553.8 ± 82.44 [sec] (p ≤ 0.001) and withstood significantly higher pressures (p ≤ 0.001) than sutured anastomoses. We demonstrate that the adhesive-based anastomosis can also resist unphysiologically high longitudinal tensile forces with a mean of 1.33 [N]. Within the limitations of an in vitro study adhesive-based suture-free anastomosis technique has the biomechanical potential to offer a seamless alternative to sutured anastomosis because of its stability, and faster handling. In vivo animal studies are needed to validate outcomes and confirm safety.

Citing Articles

Tensile strength of adhesives in peripheral nerve anastomoses: an in vitro biomechanical evaluation of four different neurorrhaphies.

Heitzer M, Kilic K, Merfort R, Winnand P, Emonts C, Bock A Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):264.

PMID: 38698476 PMC: 11067280. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01858-9.


Evaluation of the Hemostatic Effect of an Innovative Tissue Adhesive during Extraction Therapy under Rivaroxaban in a Rodent Model.

Heitzer M, Winnand P, Bock A, Ooms M, Katz M, Kniha K J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(7).

PMID: 37504828 PMC: 10381264. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14070333.


Nanoimprint Mold Consisting of an Adhesive Lap Joint between a Nanopatterned Metal Sleeve and a Carbon Composite Roll.

Khaliq A, Kamran M, Jeong M Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37242101 PMC: 10222857. DOI: 10.3390/nano13101685.


Long-Term Degradation Assessment of a Polyurethane-Based Surgical Adhesive-Assessment and Critical Consideration of Preclinical In Vitro and In Vivo Testing.

Bremer L, Hagemeister K, Moss M, Ernst L, Tolba R, Jockenhoevel S J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(3).

PMID: 36976092 PMC: 10058192. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14030168.


Novel Study to Assess Microbial Barrier Properties of Polyurethane-Based Tissue Adhesives in Comparison to the Gold Standard Dermabond®.

Mirzaei Y, Hagemeister K, Tolba R, Steitz J Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:5249214.

PMID: 36303586 PMC: 9596255. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5249214.

References
1.
Porizka M, Kopecky P, Dvorakova H, Kunstyr J, Lips M, Michalek P . Methylene blue administration in patients with refractory distributive shock - a retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):1828. PMC: 7000741. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58828-4. View

2.
Wang H, Li C, Xu H, Hu J, Zhang A, Ye S . Precise reconstruction of veins and bile ducts in rat liver transplantation. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013; 68(1):55-65. DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9694-5. View

3.
Yuk H, Varela C, Nabzdyk C, Mao X, Padera R, Roche E . Dry double-sided tape for adhesion of wet tissues and devices. Nature. 2019; 575(7781):169-174. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1710-5. View

4.
Disa J, Cordeiro P, Hidalgo D . Efficacy of conventional monitoring techniques in free tissue transfer: an 11-year experience in 750 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104(1):97-101. View

5.
Karp J . A Slick and Stretchable Surgical Adhesive. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(21):2092-2094. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcibr1709967. View