» Articles » PMID: 34192550

Lack of Predictive Tools for Conventional and Targeted Cancer Therapy: Barriers to Biomarker Development and Clinical Translation

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Jun 30
PMID 34192550
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Predictive tools, utilising biomarkers, aim to objectively assessthe potentialresponse toa particular clinical intervention in order to direct treatment.Conventional cancer therapy remains poorly served by predictive biomarkers, despite being the mainstay of treatment for most patients. In contrast, targeted therapy benefits from a clearly defined protein target for potential biomarker assessment. We discuss potential data sources of predictive biomarkers for conventional and targeted therapy, including patient clinical data andmulti-omicbiomarkers (genomic, transcriptomic and protein expression).Key examples, either clinically adopted or demonstrating promise for clinical translation, are highlighted. Following this, we provide an outline of potential barriers to predictive biomarker development; broadly discussing themes of approaches to translational research and study/trial design, and the impact of cellular and molecular tumor heterogeneity. Future avenues of research are also highlighted.

Citing Articles

Integrating alternative therapies in overcoming chemotherapy resistance in tumors.

Alqarni S, Khan N Mol Biol Rep. 2025; 52(1):239.

PMID: 39961936 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-025-10361-1.


Surface Functionalization of Nanocarriers with Anti-EGFR Ligands for Cancer Active Targeting.

Spada A, Gerber-Lemaire S Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39940134 PMC: 11820047. DOI: 10.3390/nano15030158.


Integrating traditional machine learning with qPCR validation to identify solid drug targets in pancreatic cancer: a 5-gene signature study.

Wang X, Yu P, Jia W, Wan B, Ling Z, Tang Y Front Pharmacol. 2025; 15():1539120.

PMID: 39850570 PMC: 11754184. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1539120.


Research Trends and Development Dynamics of qPCR-based Biomarkers: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.

Liu L, Mu B, Zhou Y, Wu Q, Li B, Wang D Mol Biotechnol. 2025; .

PMID: 39843617 DOI: 10.1007/s12033-024-01356-7.


A mini review of leveraging biobanking in the identification of novel biomarkers in neurological disorders: insights from a rapid single-cell sequencing pipeline.

Miller J, Rose M, Roell J, Ubhe S, Liu T, Segal B Front Neurosci. 2025; 18():1473917.

PMID: 39777270 PMC: 11703919. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1473917.


References
1.
Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M . A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(27):2817-26. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588. View

2.
McGranahan N, Swanton C . Clonal Heterogeneity and Tumor Evolution: Past, Present, and the Future. Cell. 2017; 168(4):613-628. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.018. View

3.
Lydiatt W, OSullivan B, Patel S . Major Changes in Head and Neck Staging for 2018. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018; 38:505-514. DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_199697. View

4.
Torres-Roca J, Eschrich S, Zhao H, Bloom G, Sung J, McCarthy S . Prediction of radiation sensitivity using a gene expression classifier. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(16):7169-76. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0656. View

5.
Ashton C, Wray N, Jarman A, Kolman J, Wenner D, Brody B . Ethics and methods in surgical trials. J Med Ethics. 2009; 35(9):579-83. PMC: 2736392. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.028175. View