» Articles » PMID: 34191158

Prevalence of Focal Incidental Breast Uptake on FDG-PET/CT and Risk of Malignancy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2021 Jun 30
PMID 34191158
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used for oncologic and inflammatory diseases. Focal incidental FDG uptake occurs rarely in breast tissue but has often significant consequences. This study aimed to systematically review literature regarding focal incidental breast uptake (FIBU) on FDG-PET/CT in order to yield an update on the prevalence and risk of malignancy for FIBU.

Methods: A systematic search for relevant articles published between 2012 and 2018 was performed through MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies addressing the detection of FIBU in patients without a previous history of breast malignancy were included. The QUADAS-2 was used for quality assessment, and eligible data were pooled using a fixed-effects model. I was calculated for the heterogeneity between studies.

Results: Eight studies containing 180,002 scans were included in the systematic review. The median prevalence of FIBU for both genders was 0.52% (range 0.18-22.5%). Prevalence for women was mentioned separately in five studies and varied from 0.51 to 23.5%. One study reporting a high prevalence was based on patients being staged for known malignancy, and the word "breast" was used in the search, which may have caused selection bias. Data from four studies were eligible for meta-analysis. A high degree of heterogeneity was observed for prevalence data (I of 97.5%), while moderate heterogeneity was observed for data on malignancy risk assessment (I of 62.8%). The pooled prevalence of FIBU in women was 0.61% (range 0.56-0.66%), and the pooled prevalence of malignancy of FIBUs was 38.7% (range 34.4-43.0%). The most commonly detected malignancy was invasive ductal carcinoma.

Conclusion: FIBU occurs rarely on FDG-PET/CT for female patients but yields a high risk of malignancy according to the results of published papers. Therefore, it should be considered relevant to further elucidate patients with incidentally detected FDG uptake in breast in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Focal incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Should it be spotlighted?.

Lee H, Hwang K World J Clin Cases. 2024; 12(15):2466-2474.

PMID: 38817235 PMC: 11135452. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2466.


Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[F]FDG PET/CT in no special type breast cancer : (endorsed by the ACR, ESSO, ESTRO, EUSOBI/ESR, and EUSOMA).

Vaz S, Pilkington Woll J, Cardoso F, Groheux D, Cook G, Ulaner G Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(9):2706-2732.

PMID: 38740576 PMC: 11224102. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06696-9.


Unexpected focal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in main organs; pass through or pass by?.

Lee H, Hwang K World J Clin Cases. 2024; 12(11):1885-1899.

PMID: 38660550 PMC: 11036514. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i11.1885.


Prevalence and significance of incidental findings on 68 Ga-DOTA-conjugated somatostatin receptor-targeting peptide PET/CT: a systematic review of the literature.

Bentestuen M, Gossili F, Almasi C, Zacho H Cancer Imaging. 2022; 22(1):44.

PMID: 36057635 PMC: 9441055. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00484-0.

References
1.
Chae E, Cha J, Kim H, Shin H, Kim H, Oh H . Analysis of incidental focal hypermetabolic uptake in the breast as detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT: clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Acta Radiol. 2012; 53(5):530-5. DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.120015. View

2.
Gucalp A, Traina T, Eisner J, Parker J, Selitsky S, Park B . Male breast cancer: a disease distinct from female breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018; 173(1):37-48. PMC: 7513797. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4921-9. View

3.
Minamimoto R, Senda M, Jinnouchi S, Terauchi T, Yoshida T, Inoue T . Detection of breast cancer in an FDG-PET cancer screening program: results of a nationwide Japanese survey. Clin Breast Cancer. 2014; 15(2):e139-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.09.008. View

4.
Brown A, Lindenberg M, Sankineni S, Shih J, Johnson L, Pruthy S . Does focal incidental 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake in the prostate have significance?. Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40(8):3222-9. PMC: 5612364. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0520-y. View

5.
Nomura S, Hisashige A, Yoneoka D, Kanda M, Miyamoto K, Segawa M . An assessment of the characteristics and quality of diagnostic accuracy studies for positron emission tomography conducted in Japan: a systematic review. EJNMMI Res. 2015; 5:6. PMC: 4385095. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-015-0084-4. View