» Articles » PMID: 34189619

Delivering Essential Surgical Care for Lower-limb Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Low-Resource Setting

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2021 Jun 30
PMID 34189619
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mismatched surgeon-anesthesiologist ratios often exist in low-resource settings making safe emergency essential surgical care challenging. This study is an audit of emergency essential procedures performed for lower-limb (LL) musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) when an anesthesiologist was unavailable. It aims to identify strategies for safe anesthesia.

Methods: A 5-year retrospective audit of emergency essential LL orthopedic procedures performed at remote mission hospital in Central India was performed. Out of necessity, a regional anesthesia (RA) protocol was developed in collaboration with anesthesiologists familiar with the setting. The incidence of intraoperative surgical and perioperative anesthesia complications when RA was administered by a surgeon was evaluated.

Results: During this period, 766 emergency essential LL MSDs procedures were performed. An anesthesiologist was available for only 6/766. RA was administered by a surgeon for 283/766. This included spinal anesthesia (SA) for 267/283 patients, peripheral nerve blocks for 16/283. Local infiltration and/or sedation was administered to 477/766. There were 17 intraoperative surgical complications. Anesthesia-related complications included 37/267 patients who required multiple attempts to localize subarachnoid space and SA failure in 9/267 patients all of whom had successful re-administration. Additional sedation and infiltration of local anesthetic was required in 5/267 patients.

Conclusion: Remote pre-anesthesia consultation for high-risk patients, local surgeon-anesthesiologist networking, protocol-guided management, and dedicated short duration of training in anesthesia may be considered as an alternative for delivering RA for emergency essential surgery for LL MSDs due to unavailability of anesthesiologists.

Citing Articles

Regional anaesthesia practice in public hospitals in Botswana: A cross-sectional study.

Kassa M, Madzimbamuto F, Kediegite G, Tuyishime E PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0295932.

PMID: 38113237 PMC: 10729981. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295932.


A Comparative Evaluation of Combined Nerve Block Versus Periarticular Infiltration on Postoperative Pain Relief in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Wadhawan A, Arora S, Krishna A, Mandal M, Bhalotra A, Kumar M Indian J Orthop. 2023; 57(8):1251-1266.

PMID: 37525735 PMC: 10387017. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-023-00924-4.

References
1.
Wilson J, Farley K, Bradbury T, Guild G . Is Spinal Anesthesia Safer than General Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Revision THA? Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Database. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 478(1):80-87. PMC: 7000063. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000887. View

2.
Mohan P, Kumar R . Strengthening primary care in rural India: Lessons from Indian and global evidence and experience. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019; 8(7):2169-2172. PMC: 6691438. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_426_19. View

3.
Mock C, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison D, Kruk M, Debas H . Essential surgery: key messages from Disease Control Priorities, 3rd edition. Lancet. 2015; 385(9983):2209-19. PMC: 7004823. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60091-5. View

4.
Carpenter R, Caplan R, Brown D, Stephenson C, Wu R . Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1992; 76(6):906-16. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199206000-00006. View

5.
Pawa A, El-Boghdadly K . Regional anesthesia by nonanesthesiologists. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018; 31(5):586-592. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000643. View