» Articles » PMID: 34187445

Using Intervention Mapping to Develop 'Healthy HR' Aimed at Improving Sustainable Employability of Low-educated Employees

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Jun 30
PMID 34187445
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The perspectives of low-educated employees are often neglected when designing sustainable employability (SE) interventions. As a result, the interventions offered by the employer do often not align with the needs of low-educated employees. This particular group should therefore be actively involved in the process of developing and implementing SE interventions in their work organizations. The current paper describes the development process of a web-based intervention for HR managers and direct supervisors aimed at improving the SE of low-educated employees. This intervention is specifically designed to involve low-educated employees.

Methods: The first four steps of the Intervention Mapping (IM) approach were used to systematically develop the intervention with the active involvement of stakeholders. Step 1 comprised a needs assessment including a literature review, empirical evidence, scoping search and several focus group interviews with employees and with representatives of employers. Step 2 formulated the intervention objective. During step 3, suitable theoretical methods were selected and translated to practical applications. Step 4 involved the development of a web-based intervention by integrating all information from the preceding steps.

Results: The needs assessment indicated that the employees' active involvement and employees-employer genuine dialogue should be essential characteristics of an SE intervention for low-educated employees. The online toolkit 'Healthy HR' (HHR) was developed, which contains eight steps. Each step consists of one or more tasks helping the employer and employees with developing and implementing SE interventions themselves. One or more dialogue-based tools support each task. The leading principle providing structure within HHR was Adapted Intervention Mapping.

Conclusion: Principles of IM appeared to be useful to develop the intervention HHR systematically. This development process resulted in a practical online toolkit that supports employers in the development and implementation of local SE interventions tailored to the needs of low-educated employees. These employees should be actively involved in the process through a dialogue-based approach. By using IM principles, HHR is expected to increase the effectiveness in bettering the health and well-being of low-educated employees.

Citing Articles

Giving voice to employees in low-skilled jobs works: Effect and process evaluation of a participatory sustainable employability intervention.

Hazelzet E, Bosma H, de Rijk A, Houkes I Work. 2024; 79(4):1851-1866.

PMID: 39670982 PMC: 11664181. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230507.


How a steeper organisational hierarchy prevents change-adoption and implementation of a sustainable employability intervention for employees in low-skilled jobs: a qualitative study.

Hazelzet E, Houkes I, Bosma H, de Rijk A BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):2373.

PMID: 36528559 PMC: 9759045. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14754-w.


Promoting Physical Activity among Workers: A Review of Literature and Future Directions on Developing Theory-Based Interventions.

Sun Y, Gao Y, Yu S, Wang A, Ou X, Tao D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(20).

PMID: 36294174 PMC: 9602512. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013594.


Organisational Policies and Practices for the Inclusion of Vulnerable Workers: A Scoping Review of the Employer's Perspective.

Kersten A, van Woerkom M, Geuskens G, Blonk R J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 33(2):245-266.

PMID: 36083361 PMC: 9461424. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10067-2.


"I noticed that when I have a good supervisor, it can make a Lot of difference." A Qualitative Study on Guidance of Employees with a Work Disability to Improve Sustainable Employability.

Schaap R, Stevels V, de Wolff M, Hazelzet A, Anema J, Coenen P J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 33(1):201-212.

PMID: 36066669 PMC: 10025227. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10063-6.


References
1.
Magnavita N . Obstacles and Future Prospects: Considerations on Health Promotion Activities for Older Workers in Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(6). PMC: 6025276. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15061096. View

2.
Hazelzet E, Picco E, Houkes I, Bosma H, de Rijk A . Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Sustainable Employability: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(11). PMC: 6604015. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16111985. View

3.
Tafvelin S, von Thiele Schwarz U, Nielsen K, Hasson H . Employees' and line managers' active involvement in participatory organizational interventions: Examining direct, reversed, and reciprocal effects on well-being. Stress Health. 2018; 35(1):69-80. DOI: 10.1002/smi.2841. View

4.
van der Klink J, Bultmann U, Burdorf A, Schaufeli W, Zijlstra F, Abma F . Sustainable employability--definition, conceptualization, and implications: A perspective based on the capability approach. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2015; 42(1):71-9. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3531. View

5.
Burdorf A, Porru F, Rugulies R . The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic: consequences for occupational health. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020; 46(3):229-230. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3893. View